2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.75.074502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renormalization group evolution for theΔS=1effective Hamiltonian withNf=2+1

Abstract: We discuss the renormalisation group (RG) evolution for the ∆S = 1 operators in unquenched QCD with N f = 3 (mu = m d = ms) or, more generally, N f = 2 + 1 (mu = m d = ms) flavors. In particular, we focus on the specific problem of how to treat the singularities which show up only for N f = 3 or N f = 2 + 1 in the original solution of Buras et al. for the RG evolution matrix at next-to-leading order. On top of Buras et al.'s original treatment, we use a new method of analytic continuation to obtain the correct… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that this result is consistent with Eq. (40) of Ref [25],. where, in order to regulate the singularity, a small regulator is introduced in the eigenvalues ofγ EM /α s ) part we obtain the following term,…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We find that this result is consistent with Eq. (40) of Ref [25],. where, in order to regulate the singularity, a small regulator is introduced in the eigenvalues ofγ EM /α s ) part we obtain the following term,…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It turns out that the standard form of solution is singular, but this can be removed by the analytic continuation method proposed in Ref. [23]. Details will be given in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the evolution of the coefficients from µ = M S to µ = µ h , we use a new analytical solution of the RG equations which avoids the problem of a singularity in the NLO terms discussed in Refs. [4,34]. For H |∆S|=1 eff, SUSY , we employ proper threshold matching at the scales µ t,b,c set by the top, bottom, and charm quark masses with the usual threshold matching matrices [9].…”
Section: Throughout This Letter We Usementioning
confidence: 99%