2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.81.044002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renormalization versus strong form factors for one-boson-exchange potentials

Abstract: We analyze the One Boson Exchange Potential from the point of view of Renormalization theory. We show that the nucleon-meson Lagrangean while predicting the NN force does not predict the NN scattering matrix nor the deuteron properties unambiguously due to the appearance of short distance singularities. While the problem has traditionally been circumvented by introducing vertex functions via phenomenological strong form factors, we propose to impose physical renormalization conditions on the scattering amplitu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a free spherical P-wave u3 P (r) = pr j 1 (pr), the agreement is good using u d (r) from effective range (ER) theory [6] or from a potential [3] (POT), see Fig. 2 …”
Section: Pos(eft09)046mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For a free spherical P-wave u3 P (r) = pr j 1 (pr), the agreement is good using u d (r) from effective range (ER) theory [6] or from a potential [3] (POT), see Fig. 2 …”
Section: Pos(eft09)046mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the LDS idea we have recently derived the sum rules for phase shifts [3,4] δ3 The previous sum rules have a parallel long distance potential analog , and are also well verified for r > 1.5fm [4]. This suggests that a coarse graining of the interaction using e.g.…”
Section: Sum Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For g σN N and m σ , their values can be found in many literatures on the nucleon-nucleon potential, and we list some of these [39][40][41][42] in the Tab. I, where we see there is about 20% difference between the values for g σN N and m σ .…”
Section: B Input Parameters For σ Intermediate State In T-channelmentioning
confidence: 99%