1998
DOI: 10.1063/1.532350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renormalized contact potential in two dimensions

Abstract: We obtain for the attractive Dirac δ-function potential in twodimensional quantum mechanics a renormalized formulation that avoids reference to a cutoff and running coupling constant. Dimensional transmutation is carried out before attempting to solve the system, and leads to an interesting eigenvalue problem in N −2 degrees of freedom (in the center of momentum frame) when there are N particles. The effective Hamiltonian for N − 2 particles has a nonlocal attractive interaction, and the Schrodinger equation b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The perturbation series solution of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation [18] for the delta-function potential in two dimensions is plagued with the emergence of infinities. The same problem arises in the study of the corresponding spectral problem and has led to the development of intricate renormalization schemes that amount to the introduction of a length scale for the problem [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. The problem of divergences also arises in the standard treatment of the delta-function potential in 3D.…”
Section: θ(X) :=mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The perturbation series solution of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation [18] for the delta-function potential in two dimensions is plagued with the emergence of infinities. The same problem arises in the study of the corresponding spectral problem and has led to the development of intricate renormalization schemes that amount to the introduction of a length scale for the problem [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. The problem of divergences also arises in the standard treatment of the delta-function potential in 3D.…”
Section: θ(X) :=mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here ∂ p := (∂ px , ∂ py ), (p x , p y ) are cartesian coordinates of p, and v(i ∂ p , z) := v(i∂ px , i∂ py , z). For details of the derivation of (32), see Appendix E. According to (32), H(z, p) vanishes for the values of z for which v(x, y, z) = 0. This together with Eq.…”
Section: Transfer Matrix In 3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this equation, whenever z 0 takes a positive imaginary value, i.e., Re(z 0 ) = 0 and Im(z 0 ) > 0, and |z 0 | < α, the potential has a spectral singularity at some wavenumber k ∈ [ |z 0 | 2 , α 2 ) and incident angle θ 0 = arccos(z 0 /2ik). 3 Another interesting consequence of (64) is that the potentials of the form (61) with z 0 = 0 are omnidirectionally invisible for any left-incident plane wave with wavenumber k < α/2. In particular, if z 0 = 0, the potential (61) is invisible for any left-incident plane wave whose wavenumber k and incident angle θ 0 satisfy k < α ≤ 2k and |θ 0 | < arcsin(α/k − 1).…”
Section: Finite Linear Array Of δ-Function Potentials In Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the earliest studies on the many-body or few-body version of this model in two or three dimensions dates back to the work of Flamand [12] and the unpublished thesis of Hoppe [13], and the ones in the Soviet Union, see the references given in [2]. More recently, a perturbative renormalization to the above n-body problem has been worked out in [14] and also the three-body problem in two dimensions is discussed in [15]. It has been proved that the perturbative treatment of the three-body problem shows new divergences in three dimensions after the renormalization of the two-body sector of the problem and these divergences appear for each added new particle [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%