2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13660-018-1916-3
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renormalized self-intersection local time of bifractional Brownian motion

Abstract: Let be a d-dimensional bifractional Brownian motion with Hurst parameters and . Assuming , we prove that the renormalized self-intersection local time exists in if and only if , where δ denotes the Dirac delta function. Our work generalizes the result of the renormalized self-intersection local time for fractional Brownian motion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process which is our focus is fractional Brownian motion. The self-intersection local time of this process was first studied by Rosen in [7], and this has led to a large literature on the subject, including [3,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. A key difficulty with this process, in comparison to ordinary Brownian motion, is that in general the increments of the process are not independent, and this brings considerable complications into the calculations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process which is our focus is fractional Brownian motion. The self-intersection local time of this process was first studied by Rosen in [7], and this has led to a large literature on the subject, including [3,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. A key difficulty with this process, in comparison to ordinary Brownian motion, is that in general the increments of the process are not independent, and this brings considerable complications into the calculations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the publication of this article [1], there are five errors. They have now been corrected in this correction.…”
Section: Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%