2010
DOI: 10.1177/1745691610369469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renovating the Pyramid of Needs

Abstract: Maslow’s pyramid of human needs, proposed in 1943, has been one of the most cognitively contagious ideas in the behavioral sciences. Anticipating later evolutionary views of human motivation and cognition, Maslow viewed human motives as based in innate and universal predispositions. We revisit the idea of a motivational hierarchy in light of theoretical developments at the interface of evolutionary biology, anthropology, and psychology. After considering motives at three different levels of analysis, we argue … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
303
1
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 878 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
(217 reference statements)
12
303
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…To fulfill a multitude of social and evolutionary needs, humans are innately motivated to form romantic relationships with others (Bowlby 1969;Kenrick et al 2010). When forming a romantic relationship, individuals may use a variety of signaling tactics to persuade and convince others why they would be a suitable partner.…”
Section: Relationship Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fulfill a multitude of social and evolutionary needs, humans are innately motivated to form romantic relationships with others (Bowlby 1969;Kenrick et al 2010). When forming a romantic relationship, individuals may use a variety of signaling tactics to persuade and convince others why they would be a suitable partner.…”
Section: Relationship Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These and other possibilities 30 represent possible proximate-level mechanisms for how ovulation might influence behavior, whereby each proximate-level mechanism is consistent with our ultimate-level explanation for the existence of ovulatory shift effects. Of course, these two levels of analysis are not competing (they are complementary), meaning that both types of explanations are required for a complete understanding of most phenomena (see Kenrick et al 2010). …”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biologists distinguish between two levels of explanation when examining animal behavior: ultimate explanations and proximate explanations (Kenrick, Griskevicius, Neuberg, & Schaller, 2010;Mayr, 1988). Ultimate explanations concern the evolutionary function of behavior and consider the question of why a particular behavior has evolved to occur.…”
Section: Proximate Reasons Why Ovulating Women Pursue Sexy Cadsmentioning
confidence: 99%