2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rent seeking and the excess burden of taxation

Abstract: Rent Seeking and the Excess Burden of Taxation *The social costs of rent seeking are generally evaluated with respect to rent dissipation. A common assumption is complete rent dissipation so that the value of a contested rent is the value of social loss. When rent seekers earn taxable income, there is interdependence between the social cost of rent seeking through rent dissipation and the excess burden of taxation. Through the addition of substitution to rent seeking beyond leisure, rent seeking increases the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings point out that conflict intensities are identically distributed (33.3%) in three levels (medium, high, and very high intensities) (Table 3), which gives a summarized "strong" level (66.6%) indicating a significant opposition to this type of rent seeking. The change from non-contestable to contestable rents (Aidt and Hillman, 2008) due to the excess burden in taxation (Kahana & Klunover, 2014) thus ignited huge protests. Moreover, rent-seeking groups involved in these arbitrary policies are mainly the ones of non-lay institutions (42.8%), then royal administration (28.6%), the ones of rich merchants/corporation masters (14.3%), and municipal councilors (14.3%) (Table 4).…”
Section: Review Of European Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings point out that conflict intensities are identically distributed (33.3%) in three levels (medium, high, and very high intensities) (Table 3), which gives a summarized "strong" level (66.6%) indicating a significant opposition to this type of rent seeking. The change from non-contestable to contestable rents (Aidt and Hillman, 2008) due to the excess burden in taxation (Kahana & Klunover, 2014) thus ignited huge protests. Moreover, rent-seeking groups involved in these arbitrary policies are mainly the ones of non-lay institutions (42.8%), then royal administration (28.6%), the ones of rich merchants/corporation masters (14.3%), and municipal councilors (14.3%) (Table 4).…”
Section: Review Of European Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral assumptions (see Sheremeta 2015;Dechenaux, Kovenock, and Sheremeta 2015) are required for over-dissipation to occur (some type of emotional influence or 2 There can be links between the two sources of social loss. See Kahana and Klunover (2014). 'irrationality' is required for more resources to be attracted to a contest than the value of the rent that is contested).…”
Section: The Social Loss From Contestable Rentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For surveys of aspects of 'rent seeking' and country case studies, see Congleton and Hillman (2015). 2 Social costs of rent seeking and deadweight losses are often simultaneously present: the interdependence between the two sources of social loss is described by Kahana and Klunover (2014). Mainstream normative theory recognized deadweight losses from redistribution (although the deadweight losses were often assumed away by proposing 'lump-sum' taxes and subsidies).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%