2013
DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdt030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rent-sharing, Holdup, and Wages: Evidence from Matched Panel Data

Abstract: When wage contracts are relatively short-lived, rent sharing may reduce the incentives for investment since some of the returns to sunk capital are captured by workers. In this paper we use a matched worker-firm data set from the Veneto region of Italy that combines Social Security earnings records for employees with detailed financial information for employers to measure the degree of rent sharing and test for holdup. We estimate wage models with job match effects, allowing us to control for any permanent dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
128
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
13
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the measure of wage dispersion used in the aggregate analysis. This is consistent with a large body of evidence based on linked employer-employee data suggesting that between-firm wage divergence is a key explanation of wage divergence across individual workers, including for Brazil (Helpman et al, 2017), Denmark (Bagger et al, 2013), Germany (Baumgarten et al, 2016;Card et al,2013;Goldschmidt and Schmieder, 2015), Italy (Card et al, 2014), Portugal (Card et al, 2016), Sweden (Skans et al, 2009), United Kingdom (Faggio et al, 2010) and the United States (Dunne et al, 2004;Barth et al, 2016;Song et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Facts: Aggregate and Disaggregated Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…the measure of wage dispersion used in the aggregate analysis. This is consistent with a large body of evidence based on linked employer-employee data suggesting that between-firm wage divergence is a key explanation of wage divergence across individual workers, including for Brazil (Helpman et al, 2017), Denmark (Bagger et al, 2013), Germany (Baumgarten et al, 2016;Card et al,2013;Goldschmidt and Schmieder, 2015), Italy (Card et al, 2014), Portugal (Card et al, 2016), Sweden (Skans et al, 2009), United Kingdom (Faggio et al, 2010) and the United States (Dunne et al, 2004;Barth et al, 2016;Song et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Facts: Aggregate and Disaggregated Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Wages are typically right skewed, both in observational data and in our experimental setting. Taking the natural logarithm avoids having estimates being driven by outliers (see, for example, Amiti and Davis, 2012;Autor et al, 2013;Walker, 2013;and Card et al, 2014). Specifications that use levels do not produce substantively different results and are available in the online appendix.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abowd and Lemieux (1993), for example, find in a sample of unionized plants in Canada that β is no greater than 0.4. Unsurprisingly, researchers studying environments where workers are less formally organized typically find much lower bargaining shares (Barth et al, 2011;Card, Devicienti, and Maida, 2010;Carlsson, Messina, and Skans, 2011;Guiso, Pistaferri, and Schivardi, 2005).…”
Section: Place Based Hiring Subsidiesmentioning
confidence: 99%