2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reoperation 10 years after surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
103
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
103
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgical correction of prolapse should not just reposition the prolapsed pelvic organs, it should also restore the patientʼs quality of life or at least improve it. As the recurrence rate after conventional anterior colporrhaphy with autologous tissue is high [1,13], the aim is to improve the long-term stability of the pelvic floor through implantation of an alloplastic mesh. A Cochrane analysis of the data on alloplastic meshes in prolapse surgery showed significantly better results in terms of anatomical outcome [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical correction of prolapse should not just reposition the prolapsed pelvic organs, it should also restore the patientʼs quality of life or at least improve it. As the recurrence rate after conventional anterior colporrhaphy with autologous tissue is high [1,13], the aim is to improve the long-term stability of the pelvic floor through implantation of an alloplastic mesh. A Cochrane analysis of the data on alloplastic meshes in prolapse surgery showed significantly better results in terms of anatomical outcome [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be explained by the fact that the study by Tegerstedt and Hammarstrom [8], as mentioned above, had a relatively longer follow-up period of 10 to 12 years; (although many patients were lost during the followup) [14]. History of surgery for POP and/or urinary incontinence at the time of primary surgery was associated with an increased postoperative complications and risk of reoperation in two studies [17,18]. According to Maher et al [19], there were insufficient data to allow evaluation of the impact of prolapsed surgery on continence issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, limited information suggested that concomitant TVT or Burch colposuspension might reduce postoperative incontinence rates; this benefit needs to be balanced against possible differences in costs and adverse effects. Clark et al [17] demonstrated that having undergone previous POP and urinary incontinence surgery increased the risk of reoperation to 17% compared with 12% for women who underwent a first procedure; moreover Denman et al [18] observed the abdominal approach was protective against reoperation compared with the vaginal approach. Dällenbach et al [7] suggested that POP severity did not increase the risk of complications and reoperation, and that neither did advancing age, BMI and vaginal deliveries, but suggested that the number of prolapsed vaginal wall segments and the absence of complete repair at initial surgery increased the risk of reoperation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the etiology of recurrence of POP is frequently discussed in the literature, very few studies report on the outcome of surgical treatment in women with recurrent disease. In the published case series to date, data on the long-term outcome are often lacking or difficult to compare and therefore the cumulative surgical cure rate and/or independent efficacy of each surgical technique remain uncertain [3,7]. This is usually attributed to the use of various and non-validated tools to measure the outcome of a large number of operative techniques, particularly the novel disposable surgical kits, in a small subset of patient cohorts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is usually attributed to the use of various and non-validated tools to measure the outcome of a large number of operative techniques, particularly the novel disposable surgical kits, in a small subset of patient cohorts. The lack of a uniformly accepted definition of recurrence including a detailed description of the anatomical location of the defect and whether this is in the same or different vaginal compartment may also be responsible [3,6,7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%