1989
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.39.3.430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reoperation for malignant astrocytoma

Abstract: We evaluated 15 consecutive patients with malignant astrocytomas who were reoperated for functional status and survival. Their Karnovsky Performance Status (KPS) was not changed by surgery. None suffered perioperative death, wound infection, or complications. Patients with glioblastoma maintained KPS unchanged for a mean of 13 weeks (median, 10 weeks); with anaplastic astrocytoma, mean, 37.2 weeks (median, 24 weeks). Life spans were approximately twice that of non-reoperated historical controls. Reoperation fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although in our recent study we identified significant differences between recurrent and newly diagnosed glioma patients with respect to neurological outcome and incidence of postoperative ischemic lesions, there are still few and contradictory data available on the resection of recurrent intrinsic brain tumors. 1,2,4,8,15,19,28,29 Ultimately, even though we were able to detect relevant ischemic events by intraoperative monitoring, the key question remains of how to avoid these events. Certainly a meticulous surgical technique tailored to the vascular architecture at risk, whether cortical arteries and draining veins or subcortical perforating arteries, is the mainstay of a safe resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although in our recent study we identified significant differences between recurrent and newly diagnosed glioma patients with respect to neurological outcome and incidence of postoperative ischemic lesions, there are still few and contradictory data available on the resection of recurrent intrinsic brain tumors. 1,2,4,8,15,19,28,29 Ultimately, even though we were able to detect relevant ischemic events by intraoperative monitoring, the key question remains of how to avoid these events. Certainly a meticulous surgical technique tailored to the vascular architecture at risk, whether cortical arteries and draining veins or subcortical perforating arteries, is the mainstay of a safe resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In reviews of both institutional and cooperative group experiences with malignant gliomas, conclusions regarding the influence of aggressive surgery on survival are conflicting. Reports noting a positive correlation include those by Stenning et al [26], Gehan and Walker [27], Chang et al [2], Ammirati et al [28], and Vick et al [29]. Those observing no significant relationship between extent of surgery and survival include studies by Fulton et aI.…”
Section: Months From Start Of Treatlvlentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In selected patients, a repeated operation can be performed. 1,3,15,33 The perioperative complications have been reported to vary both in type and severity in this group for a number of reasons. Some authors have suggested that a repeated operation for malignant glioma is not associated with increased risk, 27,35 some have shown statistically insignificant trends toward increased complications, 6,29 and some have suggested that there clearly is an increased risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%