“…Efforts to engineer increased production and accumulation of TAG in both oilseeds and vegetative tissues for more energy-dense biomass have achieved the most success through the combined targeting of multiple aspects of developmental central carbon metabolism to fatty acid synthesis (‘Push’), the incorporation of those fatty acids into TAG biosynthesis (‘Pull’), and stabilization of lipid droplets and minimization of TAG turnover (‘Package and Protect’) ( Beechey-Gradwell et al, 2019 ; Durrett et al, 2008 ; Parajuli et al, 2020 ; Slocombe et al, 2009 ; Vanhercke et al, 2014b , 2019b ; Weselake, 2016 ; Xu and Shanklin, 2016 ), with synergistic increases in TAG yields in vegetative tissues often observed when multiple genes are simultaneously targeted ( Kelly et al, 2013 ; Vanhercke et al, 2013 ; Winichayakul et al, 2013 ; Zale et al, 2016 ). The highest elevated TAG yields in leaves reported thus far (reviewed in Vanhercke et al, 2019b ) have been achieved in engineered tobacco lines ( Andrianov et al, 2010 ; Cai et al, 2019 ; Vanhercke et al, 2014a , 2017 ; Zhou et al, 2020 ), with some high lipid-producing (HLP) lines producing over 30% foliar TAG (DW) without drastic consequences on plant growth. Metabolic explanations for carbon partitioning in these lines, however, are incomplete, are not quantitative or mechanistic, and do not indicate why engineering efforts are more successful in certain plant species compared to others.…”