1989
DOI: 10.1002/cne.902880310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reorganization of visual pathways following posthatching removal of one retina in pigeons

Abstract: Organization of visual pathways was studied in 2-month-old pigeons that underwent unilateral retinal removal on either the day of hatching (ERA, i.e., early retinal ablated) or the 9th day after hatching (LRA, i.e., late retinal ablated). A general size reduction of visual areas contralateral to the removed retina was found in ERA pigeons, which additionally showed an altered differentiation of thalamic visual targets as well as a different cytoarchitectonic arrangement of the superficial layers of the optic t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to previous results obtained in different avian species, Wulst-projecting neurons appear to be more numerous in the ipsiiateral thalamus than on the contralateral brain side [24,27], In contrast, our find ing of comparable numbers of ipsilaterally and contralaterally projecting thalamic neurons indicates that in the little owl the uncrossed and crossed pathways to the Wulst are almost equivalent. This is in keeping with the electrophysiological results obtained with visually evoked potentials recorded from the Wulst surface that show similar responses to stimulation of either eye [13].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…According to previous results obtained in different avian species, Wulst-projecting neurons appear to be more numerous in the ipsiiateral thalamus than on the contralateral brain side [24,27], In contrast, our find ing of comparable numbers of ipsilaterally and contralaterally projecting thalamic neurons indicates that in the little owl the uncrossed and crossed pathways to the Wulst are almost equivalent. This is in keeping with the electrophysiological results obtained with visually evoked potentials recorded from the Wulst surface that show similar responses to stimulation of either eye [13].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…These processes occur for the most part between E9 and E12. The initial differentiation of RGC dendrites takes place before retinal or central connections are formed (Nishimura, 1980), and the independence in development of retina and retinorecipient structures has been established by studies, where either the eye primordia or the tectal primordia were surgically removed (Kelly and Cowan, 1972;Cowan, 1983, 1984;Bagnoli et al, 1989;Vanselow et al, 1990). Even after bilateral resection of the eye cups, the gross histological development of the optic tectum is at first not affected, with the exception, of course, that the stratum opticum cannot form.…”
Section: Autonomy and Interdependence In De6elopment Of Retina And Nbormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, when normal innervation of the retinorecipient strata is due, tectal neurons degenerate in the input-deprived layers. This will occur only if the eye cups are removed before the projection has formed (Kelly and Cowan, 1972;Bagnoli et al, 1989;Macdonald and Wilson, 1996). Similarly, RGC differentiation in the absence of tectal primordia begins normally, including the formation of different morphological types.…”
Section: Autonomy and Interdependence In De6elopment Of Retina And Nbormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it is conceivable that the formation of this feature is influenced by retinal input. It has been shown that the differentiation of the outer retinoreceptive layers depends upon the ingrowth of retinal fibers (Kelly and Cowan 1972;Bagnoli et al 1989Bagnoli et al , 1992. The different retinorecipient layers of the OT are innervated by retinal fibers with different terminal arbor morphology, possibly belonging to different ganglion cell types (Repérant and Angaut 1977).…”
Section: Mechanisms For the Cytoarchitectonic And Spatial Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%