2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11678-016-0373-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reosteosynthese vs. Prothese nach fehlgeschlagener Humeruskopfosteosynthese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to its complexity, the operative treatment of PHF remains a surgical challenge. Consequently, high complication rates have been reported, especially for humeral head-preserving fracture fixation in elderly patients [1][2][3][4]10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Owing to its complexity, the operative treatment of PHF remains a surgical challenge. Consequently, high complication rates have been reported, especially for humeral head-preserving fracture fixation in elderly patients [1][2][3][4]10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional success of anatomic fracture arthroplasty is related to the correct ingrowth of the tuberosities [7,8]. In the case of rotator cuff insufficiency or fatty degeneration of the muscles, reversed fracture arthroplasty is an alternative option [9,10]. Because of tuberosity-related complications with anatomic hemiarthroplasty, primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is increasingly recommended as a surgical treat-ment option for elderly patients with displaced PHF [9,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%