2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reoxygenation speed and its implication for cellular injury responses in hypoxic RAW 264.7 cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are not consistent with current literature ( Lee et al, 2017 ; Srinivasan and Avadhani, 2007 ). For instance, when RAW 264.7 cells were incubated in hypoxic conditions (1% O 2 ) for 20 h, there was a significant increase in ROS production when compared to the cell incubated in normoxic conditions ( Lee et al, 2017 ) and when RAW 264.7 cells were grown under hypoxia (0.5% O 2 ) for 10 h, there was a significant increase in ROS production when compared to the cells grown under normoxia ( Srinivasan and Avadhani, 2007 ). Consequently, differences in exposure time and oxygen concentrations may have affected the production of ROS.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings are not consistent with current literature ( Lee et al, 2017 ; Srinivasan and Avadhani, 2007 ). For instance, when RAW 264.7 cells were incubated in hypoxic conditions (1% O 2 ) for 20 h, there was a significant increase in ROS production when compared to the cell incubated in normoxic conditions ( Lee et al, 2017 ) and when RAW 264.7 cells were grown under hypoxia (0.5% O 2 ) for 10 h, there was a significant increase in ROS production when compared to the cells grown under normoxia ( Srinivasan and Avadhani, 2007 ). Consequently, differences in exposure time and oxygen concentrations may have affected the production of ROS.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that the formation of ROS depends on constant cycles of anoxia and reoxygenation ( Dawson et al, 1993 ). Another study repeated that reoxygenation increased the formation of ROS in RAW 264.7 cell with fast reoxygenation producing more ROS when compared to slow reoxygenation ( Lee et al, 2017 ). In our study, we have seen a decrease in ROS when the cells were exposed to hypoxia and it may be due to exposing the cells to hypoxia for a longer period of time where no more available oxygen was present to produce ROS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%