2020
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2019.2927739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair and Resource Scheduling in Unbalanced Distribution Systems Using Neighborhood Search

Abstract: This paper proposes an optimization strategy to assist utility operators to recover power distribution systems after large outages. Specifically, a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model is developed for co-optimizing crews, resources, and network operations. The MILP model coordinates damage isolation, network reconfiguration, distributed generator redispatch, and crew/resource logistics. In addition, a framework for integrating different types of photovoltaic (PV) systems in the restoration process is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e objective function values of the two algorithms are very similar when the number of tasks is less than 40, but when the number of tasks exceeds 40, the objective function values obtained by the algorithm proposed in this paper are less than those obtained by the algorithms in [15] and [19].…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…e objective function values of the two algorithms are very similar when the number of tasks is less than 40, but when the number of tasks exceeds 40, the objective function values obtained by the algorithm proposed in this paper are less than those obtained by the algorithms in [15] and [19].…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Figure 6 shows that as the number of tasks grows, the time required by the three scheduling algorithms grows. However, the algorithm in [19] takes less time to complete in total than the algorithm in this paper.…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations