In this paper, it is presented the experimental results of a campaign on diagonal compression tests, as of ASTM E519-
IntroductionUnreinforced masonry (URM) buildings are one of the most used construction type in Europe, around the Mediterranean basin and Balkan peninsula. These regions are characterized with medium-to-high levels of seismic hazard. A vast number of URM buildings in these regions are vulnerable against earthquakes which are acknowledged to be one of the major cause of their damage, often even for their collapse. In such event, the load bearing walls are subjected to a combination of lateral seismic forces, that are in the form of out-of-plane or in-plane loading depending on the orientation of the building with seismic loading direction.Masonry structures, under such type of loading condition, manifest a brittle behavior, a relatively poor performance and are susceptible to high degrees of structural damage. Since the out-of-plane failure could be avoided by additional structural elements, the overall seismic performance of URM buildings depends on the capacity of in-plane walls to safely transfer the lateral loads to foundations, providing the post-earthquake stability necessary to avoid collapse of the entire structure [1].Moreover, during their lifespan, many of those buildings have suffered from the combined effects of inadequate construction techniques, seismic and wind loads, foundation settlements and deterioration of construction materials [2].To increase low parameters of masonry such as tensile and shear strength, as well as to improve the poor structural performance of URM structures under seismic actions, various strengthening techniques have been developed and applied throughout history of construction. The earliest techniques, the so-called traditional, consist of applying the reinforcement in form of: (i) filling cracks and voids by grouting; ii) stitching of large cracks and weak areas with metallic or brick elements; iii) external or internal post-tensioning with steel ties; iv) shotcrete jacketing; v) ferrocement and vi) center core etc. [3,4].Some successful examples of ferrocement jacketing have been observed in concrete structures [5][6][7][8] as well as in masonry structures where ferrocement provided a considerable increase in ductility, improvement of crack resistance [9,10], and increased stiffness and load carrying capacity as well as increase of in-plane resistance [11][12][13][14][15].