1993
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199306000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of a transected sciatic nerve. A study of nerve regeneration and functional recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of these femoral shaft fractures required open reduction and internal fixation. 1,9,25 Thirty-four patients required surgical exploration because their injuries failed to improve spontaneously. Seventeen underwent neurolysis, and only one was eligible for end-to-end suture repair of a focal injury created by a fracture, whereas 16 received graft repairs because stretch damage usually involved a considerable length of nerve.…”
Section: Thigh-level Sciatic Nerve Traumatic Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these femoral shaft fractures required open reduction and internal fixation. 1,9,25 Thirty-four patients required surgical exploration because their injuries failed to improve spontaneously. Seventeen underwent neurolysis, and only one was eligible for end-to-end suture repair of a focal injury created by a fracture, whereas 16 received graft repairs because stretch damage usually involved a considerable length of nerve.…”
Section: Thigh-level Sciatic Nerve Traumatic Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Simmons et al have reported that femoral nerve paralysis in hip arthroplasties may reach 2%; however, most patients present complete recovery at 12 months (12). Sunderland et al has reported up to 2% of transient neurological injuries, but 0.5% may have permanent neurological damage after a primary hip prosthesis (13). Al-Ajmi et al have reported that the risk of nerve injury due to an anterior approach after hip arthroplasty is very rare, meanwhile riskier than the posterior approach (1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known, that nerve regeneration happens at a rate of ∼ 1 mm per day,20, 22 motor endplates perish 12–16 months after denervation,20 and that the innervated muscles stay viable 18–24 months postinjury 15. When regeneration rate and distance to cover are disproportionate, this results in irreversible degeneration and fibrosis, associated with permanent paralysis of the denervated muscles 23. The use of a nerve bypass to augment peripheral axonal growth while avoiding further loss of the native nerve with leaving the neuroma in place and inserting an additional path for axonal regrowth by two sequential end‐to‐side neurorrhaphies has been suggested to solve this problem 8, 9…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%