2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01274.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of Bone Defect in Femoral Condyle Using Microencapsulated Chitosan, Nanohydroxyapatite/Collagen and Poly(L‐Lactide)‐Based Microsphere‐Scaffold Delivery System

Abstract: Bone repair ability of microencapsulated chitosan, nanohydroxyapatite/collagen (nHAC), and poly(L-lactide) (PLLA)-based microsphere-scaffold delivery system was investigated in present research, with nHAC/PLLA composite scaffold as a control. Chitosan microspheres (CMs) encapsulated with bone morphogenetic protein-2-derived synthetic peptide were incorporated into nHAC and PLLA-based matrix via a thermally induced phase separation method, in which dioxane was used as the solvent for PLLA. Compared with the rap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of CS with other natural polymers, such as collagen, gelatin, and silk fibroin, synthetic polymers such as PLGA, and compounds of calcium and phosphate, such as HA, permits an improvement in specific properties like solubility, biodegradation, and mechanical performance of CS as a function of the tissue to be regenerated [10]. In fact, some studies have clearly shown that the association of CS with collagen [42, 44, 68], silk fibroin [73], and HA [45, 57, 58] was capable of promoting greater tissue regeneration than pure CS, as in these studies pure or combined CS scaffolds were implanted, making it possible to establish a comparison between them. However, in the vast majority of studies evaluating CS combined with other biomaterials, the favorable results obtained cannot be attributed to the associations, as pure CS was neither evaluated nor used as a control [8, 30, 32, 41, 46, 48, 49, 53, 54, 62, 63, 67, 71, 76, 77, 80, 81, 83, 86, 88].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of CS with other natural polymers, such as collagen, gelatin, and silk fibroin, synthetic polymers such as PLGA, and compounds of calcium and phosphate, such as HA, permits an improvement in specific properties like solubility, biodegradation, and mechanical performance of CS as a function of the tissue to be regenerated [10]. In fact, some studies have clearly shown that the association of CS with collagen [42, 44, 68], silk fibroin [73], and HA [45, 57, 58] was capable of promoting greater tissue regeneration than pure CS, as in these studies pure or combined CS scaffolds were implanted, making it possible to establish a comparison between them. However, in the vast majority of studies evaluating CS combined with other biomaterials, the favorable results obtained cannot be attributed to the associations, as pure CS was neither evaluated nor used as a control [8, 30, 32, 41, 46, 48, 49, 53, 54, 62, 63, 67, 71, 76, 77, 80, 81, 83, 86, 88].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result suggested that the activity of aminobiotinated rhBMP‐2 has been found more than the carboxy‐biotinated rhBMP‐2, but in the presence of avidin the scenario become reverse. Also, the phenol/imidazole‐treated rhBMP‐2 failed to retain the rhBMP‐2 bioactivity . Moreover, Uludag et al showed that protein pI has influence on early retention of rhBMP‐2 …”
Section: Bone Regeneration With Modified Bmp‐2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xufeng Niu et al. (127) of Tsinghua University, Beijing, China investigated the repair of bone defects in femoral condyle using microencapsulated chitosan (CHIT), nanohydroxyapatite/collagen (nHAC), and poly(l‐lactide)‐based microsphere–scaffold delivery system with nHAC/PLLA composite scaffold as a control. Compared with the rapid release from chitosan microspheres (CMs), the synthetic peptide was delivered from CMs/nHAC/PLLA microsphere–scaffold composite in a temporally controlled manner.…”
Section: Orthopedic Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%