1956
DOI: 10.1902/jop.1956.27.2.92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of Gingival Defects by a Sliding Flap Operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
219
0
18

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 369 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
219
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Jankovic (2010) used a HI that was based on redness, granulation tissue, bleeding, suppuration and epithelialization for the first and second week post surgery and reported a statistically significant superior healing for the one-week postoperatively in CAF + PRF when compared to CAF + EMD (p < 0.05). However, this significant difference was absent at the 2 weeks follow up 4.51±0.21 vs. 4 Pain was recorded on a horizontal pain scale, where 0 meant no pain, 1 intermediate pain, and 2 severe pain, before and after the procedure in three studies. Jankovic (2010) [38] assessed post-operative pain for 7 days after the surgery, the authors stated that the pain intensity was significantly different between CAF + EMD group and CAF + PRF group favoring the later in the first 5 days 0.82±0.22 vs. 0.60±0.33 (p = 0.048), and at day 7 this difference was no longer significant between the groups (p = 0.143).…”
Section: Amentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Jankovic (2010) used a HI that was based on redness, granulation tissue, bleeding, suppuration and epithelialization for the first and second week post surgery and reported a statistically significant superior healing for the one-week postoperatively in CAF + PRF when compared to CAF + EMD (p < 0.05). However, this significant difference was absent at the 2 weeks follow up 4.51±0.21 vs. 4 Pain was recorded on a horizontal pain scale, where 0 meant no pain, 1 intermediate pain, and 2 severe pain, before and after the procedure in three studies. Jankovic (2010) [38] assessed post-operative pain for 7 days after the surgery, the authors stated that the pain intensity was significantly different between CAF + EMD group and CAF + PRF group favoring the later in the first 5 days 0.82±0.22 vs. 0.60±0.33 (p = 0.048), and at day 7 this difference was no longer significant between the groups (p = 0.143).…”
Section: Amentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Dişeti çekilmesinin örtülmesinde, laterale kaydırılan flep, 4 ince veya kalın serbest dişeti grefti, 5,6 bağ dokusu grefti, 7 Mikrocerrahi, motor yeteneklerde artışa bağlı hassasiyetin artmasına ve tremorun azalmasına dolayısıyla da daha düzgün el hareketi yapılabilmeye katkı sağlayarak cerrahi yeteneği arttırmaktadır. Periodontolojide mikrocerrahi aletlerinin ve mikrocerrahi prensiplerinin kullanılmasının, dokuda daha az travma oluşması, morbiditeyi azaltması, hastada daha az anksiyete oluşturması, hassas ve primer yara kapatılmasını sağlaması, minimal invaziv işlem olması, teşhis kabiliyetini ve estetik başarıyı arttırması, cerrahi müdahalenin kalitesini ve kök yüzeyi düzleştirmesinde etkinliği arttırması gibi avantajları vardır.…”
Section: öZetunclassified
“…In de regel betroff en dit de lateraalwaartse en coronaalwaartse mucoperiostale verschuivingsplastieken, omschreven als de zogeheten 'single-layer' technieken (Grupe en Warren, 1956;Sumner, 1969 Met de coronaalwaarts verplaatste fl ap kunnen enkelvoudige én meervoudige recessies worden bedekt. Nadeel van deze techniek is echter dat deze minder geschikt is voor situaties waarbij een beperkte zone gekeratiniseerde gingiva aanwezig is.…”
Section: 'Single-layer' Techniekenunclassified