2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of silorane-based dental composites: Influence of surface treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
34
2
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
34
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this study, fatigue simulation did not change the bond strengths in any of the test. In our previous study, in contrast to common experience, fatigue simulation increased the bond strength of repaired silorane-based composite materials under the same conditions of fatigue used in this study except for the group treated by silane coupling agent and bonding agent, and we concluded that the improved repair strength after fatigue simulation seems to be a result of the post-curing effects of the bonding agent and repair materials 13) . The reason why fatigue simulation did not change the bond strengths in the present study despite identical conditions of fatigue is that the repair bond strengths between the dissimilar composites (siloranebased composite and methacrylate-based composite) were not durable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, in this study, fatigue simulation did not change the bond strengths in any of the test. In our previous study, in contrast to common experience, fatigue simulation increased the bond strength of repaired silorane-based composite materials under the same conditions of fatigue used in this study except for the group treated by silane coupling agent and bonding agent, and we concluded that the improved repair strength after fatigue simulation seems to be a result of the post-curing effects of the bonding agent and repair materials 13) . The reason why fatigue simulation did not change the bond strengths in the present study despite identical conditions of fatigue is that the repair bond strengths between the dissimilar composites (siloranebased composite and methacrylate-based composite) were not durable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…In our previous study, it is reported that the application of Xeno V had nearly no additional benefit on the repair strength of Ceram X for the same reason 12) . Higher-filled or less sculptable composite materials such as Filtek Silorane might benefit more from the application of a bonding agent, as described in our precious study of the repair strength of Silorane 13) . In addition, silorane-based composites are hydrophobic compared to methacrylate-based composites, and thus the bonding agent might not have increased the wettability of the surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations