2012
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of stent graft-induced retrograde type A aortic dissection using the E-vita open prosthesis

Abstract: Retrograde aortic dissection type A is a serious complication of thoracic endovascular repair of acute aortic type B dissection. Despite the small number of patients investigated in this study, the frozen elephant trunk technique appears to be a feasible bail-out strategy for the treatment of these acute aortic events.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
28
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Suitable patients should be hemodynamically stable and the ascending aortic FL thrombosed while the ascending aorta is preferably not severely dilated (ie, <5.5 cm). Recently, there has been a plethora of studies on retro-A AD occurring secondarily to thoracic endovascular aortic repair, [8][9][10] but the literature on spontaneous acute retro-A AD, which is a distinct entity, is limited. Previous studies were mostly conducted on small patient cohorts or mentioned through case reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suitable patients should be hemodynamically stable and the ascending aortic FL thrombosed while the ascending aorta is preferably not severely dilated (ie, <5.5 cm). Recently, there has been a plethora of studies on retro-A AD occurring secondarily to thoracic endovascular aortic repair, [8][9][10] but the literature on spontaneous acute retro-A AD, which is a distinct entity, is limited. Previous studies were mostly conducted on small patient cohorts or mentioned through case reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supraaortic vessels may be anastomosed end-to-end to side branches of the graft or as a patch. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Unfortunately, some delivery systems are quite cumbersome and deployment of the stented portion of the graft might be imprecise, therefore causing a far more distal landing than intended.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10) TAR-FET has been reported as a valuable tool for the treatment of the same sites. 11) We mainly performed TAR-FET in patients who were not indicated for TEVAR (i.e., those who were outside the scope of our institutional recommendations and required debranching+TEVAR or those at increased risk for RTAD). There are several reasons supporting early adoption of TAR-FET.…”
Section: Discussion Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, there are certain disadvantages, such as uncertain peripheral landing (iatrogenically occurring peripheral new entry and SINE owing to TEVAR performed for Stanford type B aortic dissection and bending of aortic grafts), the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, circulatory arrest (TAR is needed for cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest, whereas TEVAR is not), cooling of the entire body, lower body circulatory arrest, and spinal cord disorders associated with spinal cord ischemia. 8,11) Adjustments were made to overcome these drawbacks. First, a longer FET was selected (90-120 mm) and was placed parallel to the descending thoracic aorta to prevent interference with the aortic wall.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%