2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of subtotal tympanic membrane perforations: A temporal bone study of several tympanoplasty materials

Abstract: The aim of this project was to investigate the effects of different types of graft material, and different remaining segments of the native TM on its motion. In twelve human temporal bones, controlled TM perforations were made to simulate three different conditions. (1) Central perforation leaving both annular and umbo rims of native TM. (2) Central perforation leaving only a malleal rim of native TM. (3) Central perforation leaving only an annular rim of native TM. Five different graft materials (1) perichond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no graft failure was observed in our radiated patients, observations of scant cartilage matrix with decreased number of viable chondrocytes have been reported (41). When considering auditory outcomes, cartilage addition (0.5-1 mm width) when well-positioned without any direct contact with the sulcus has shown to have minimal impact on sound transmission (42)(43)(44). Although not significant, the control group tended to have better hearing outcomes (mean AC PTA and ABG functional gains) than the patients of oncology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Although no graft failure was observed in our radiated patients, observations of scant cartilage matrix with decreased number of viable chondrocytes have been reported (41). When considering auditory outcomes, cartilage addition (0.5-1 mm width) when well-positioned without any direct contact with the sulcus has shown to have minimal impact on sound transmission (42)(43)(44). Although not significant, the control group tended to have better hearing outcomes (mean AC PTA and ABG functional gains) than the patients of oncology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…24,25 Although we do not have bone conductive values in the high frequencies, we believe that this is a conductive loss. Cadaveric studies support the possibility of high frequency loss from both material 26 and location of the graft. 27 Sensorineural loss from ossicular or acoustic trauma is less likely because this study found equivalence between pre- and post-operative bone conduction in the frequencies obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%