1986
DOI: 10.3109/17453678608994410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: Augmentation versus conventional suture of fresh rupture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the authors stated, Bgiven these successful outcomes, our results beg the question as to whether the acuity of surgery is the most important variable or whether adequate tissue length and quality are the true predictors of success.^Similarly, the current case did not qualify for a repair in the acute setting but did qualify with regard to the optimal conditions for arthroscopic ACL repair of (1) proximal location of the tear, (2) sufficient tissue length, and (3) excellent tissue quality. The case presented suggests that maybe it is not the time from injury to repair that is critical for ACL repair as traditionally suggested [2,20,21,36], but that the conditions of the ligament may actually be more important. These conditions are indeed frequently seen in the acute setting but can also be seen in the non-acute setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the authors stated, Bgiven these successful outcomes, our results beg the question as to whether the acuity of surgery is the most important variable or whether adequate tissue length and quality are the true predictors of success.^Similarly, the current case did not qualify for a repair in the acute setting but did qualify with regard to the optimal conditions for arthroscopic ACL repair of (1) proximal location of the tear, (2) sufficient tissue length, and (3) excellent tissue quality. The case presented suggests that maybe it is not the time from injury to repair that is critical for ACL repair as traditionally suggested [2,20,21,36], but that the conditions of the ligament may actually be more important. These conditions are indeed frequently seen in the acute setting but can also be seen in the non-acute setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It was thought that performing repair in the acute setting provided optimal tissue quality and prevented ligament retraction and/or reabsorption [2,21,22,36]. Therefore, primary ACL repair was not performed in the nonacute setting as surgeons tended to prefer ACL reconstruction under these circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would agree to these observations that an attempt to primary repair could be successfully attempted till 3 months post injury. Although literature suggest that the key to success in these repairs is to perform it acutely preferably within days [17,18] . One of the limitations of our study is our small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to high failure rates and poor clinical outcomes the primary repair lost popularity, and currently, ligament reconstruction, with either autogenous or allogenous material, is the treatment of choice. [7][8][9][10][11] Autogenous refers to the graft material being harvested from the same individual, whereas an allogenous graft is taken from a specially prepared cadaveric specimen. The mid-third patella tendon as well as the hamstring tendons are common donor sites, with a slight preference for the hamstring tendons, because of lower donor site morbidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%