2010
DOI: 10.4037/ccn2010193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repair of Ventricular Aneurysm After Stage I Modified Sano-Norwood Procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may help patients avoid complications of RV dysfunction such as pseudoaneurysm formation, heart failure requiring increased inotropic support, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or ventricular assist device, heart transplants, and death. 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 Although we routinely perform left-sided RV-PA-C, the PT could potentially also be used for right-sided RV-PA-C placement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may help patients avoid complications of RV dysfunction such as pseudoaneurysm formation, heart failure requiring increased inotropic support, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or ventricular assist device, heart transplants, and death. 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 Although we routinely perform left-sided RV-PA-C, the PT could potentially also be used for right-sided RV-PA-C placement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…94 -96 Other complications include perioperative arrhythmias that are more common than in mBT, 97 hypocontractile ventricular state, 98 and the development of ventricular pseudoaneurysm. 99,100…”
Section: Clinical Studies Comparing Mbt and Sano Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[94][95][96] Other complications include perioperative arrhythmias that are more common than in mBT, 97 hypocontractile ventricular state, 98 and the development of ventricular pseudoaneurysm. 99,100 The classic Norwood procedure and Sano modification have shown benefits as well as complications in patients with HLHS. Overall, definite evidence of one procedure being significantly better than the other is lacking, mainly due to the retrospective nature of most studies that evaluated clinically relevant outcomes.…”
Section: Clinical Studies Comparing Mbt and Sano Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%