2003
DOI: 10.1207/s15328031us0201_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repairing Tom Swift's Electric Factor Analysis Machine

Abstract: Proper use of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) requires the researcher to make a series of careful decisions. Despite attempts by Floyd and Widaman (1995), Fabrigar, Wegener, MacCallum, andStrahan (1999), and others to elucidate critical issues involved in these decisions, examples of questionable use of EFA are still common in the applied factor analysis literature. Poor decisions regarding the model to be used, the criteria used to decide how many factors to retain, and the rotation method can have drastic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
482
0
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 684 publications
(498 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
6
482
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In our results, only three items had a value below .30 on its target factor. Preacher and MacCallum (2003) recommend using statistical significance and confidence intervals, such as the ones obtained with ESEM, not just the common recommendation that factor loadings are meaningful when they exceed .30 or .40. The results show that forty-eight out of fifty target loadings were relevant according to the confidence intervals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our results, only three items had a value below .30 on its target factor. Preacher and MacCallum (2003) recommend using statistical significance and confidence intervals, such as the ones obtained with ESEM, not just the common recommendation that factor loadings are meaningful when they exceed .30 or .40. The results show that forty-eight out of fifty target loadings were relevant according to the confidence intervals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study investigates the factor structure of DTI parameters. We believe that explorative factor analysis (EFA) is more suitable than the PCA that previous studies have used because the main purpose of this study is not merely to reduce data but to identify unobservable latent variables that account for the shared variances (covariance) among variables that incorporate error of measurement (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cattell's scree test criteria [48] and Kaiser's criteria [49] were considered to determine the number of factors to extract. Although the unrotated solution revealed 10 factors with eigenvalues >1, use of the scree plot is considered a more accurate determination of which factors to retain [50]. As the scree plot demonstrated a break in the slope between factors three and four, a three factor solution was indicated, which accounted for 48.78 per cent of the variance (range of eigenvalues 2.28 -16).…”
Section: Factor Structure Of the Hfbsmentioning
confidence: 96%