2016
DOI: 10.1214/16-ejs1187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reparameterized Birnbaum-Saunders regression models with varying precision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The RVs U i are often assumed to be independent and identically distributed as gamma, inverse Gaussian, log‐normal, or Weibull, which have simple Laplace transforms and then are convenient to use. We consider a reparameterized version of the BS distribution because it allows us to mimic a property of the gamma distribution, as mentioned, traditionally used in frailty models …”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The RVs U i are often assumed to be independent and identically distributed as gamma, inverse Gaussian, log‐normal, or Weibull, which have simple Laplace transforms and then are convenient to use. We consider a reparameterized version of the BS distribution because it allows us to mimic a property of the gamma distribution, as mentioned, traditionally used in frailty models …”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We derive local influence for the proposed model and evaluate the performance of the ML estimators by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. In the model, the frailty follows a BS distribution with a parameterization defined in terms of the mean, whereas its variance is a quadratic function of this mean . Such a characteristic allows us to mimic a property of the highly used gamma frailty distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…() and Santos‐Neto et al. (, ). In the context of frailty models, it can be very competitive in terms of fitting. It belongs to the class of log‐symmetric distributions, such as the case of the generalized BS, LN, log‐logistic, log‐Laplace, log‐Student‐ t , log‐power‐exponential, log‐slash, and F distributions; see Vanegas and Paula (, ). The log‐symmetric class of distributions arises when an RV has the same distribution as its reciprocal or as ordinary symmetry of the distribution of the logged RV; see Jones ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhatti (2010) suggested that (B2) might possibly: (C1) improve the model fit, since for asymmetric, heavy-tailed distributions, as occurs with TD data, the median is often considered as a better measure of central tendency than the mean; and (C2) increase the forecasting ability due to the fact that the mean is greater than the median for skew distributions. In this context, we consider two models: A first new mean-based model (BSACD1 in short) specified in terms of a time-varying conditional mean duration, as usual in ACD models, using a reparameterized version of the BS distribution (see Leiva et al, 2014a;Santos-Neto et al, 2016); and a second median-based model (BSACD2 in short) specified in terms of a time-varying conditional median duration. Thus, the primary objective of this paper is to compare both BSACD1 and BSACD2 models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%