2019
DOI: 10.1177/1471082x19838651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reparametrization of COM–Poisson regression models with applications in the analysis of experimental data

Abstract: In the analysis of count data often the equidispersion assumption is not suitable, hence the Poisson regression model is inappropriate. As a generalization of the Poisson distribution the COM-Poisson distribution can deal with under-, equi-and overdispersed count data. It is a member of the exponential family of distributions and has the Poisson and geometric distributions as special cases, as well as the Bernoulli distribution as a limiting case. In spite of the nice properties of the COM-Poisson distribution… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, . In the same vein, an alternative re-parameterization of the COM-Poisson was proposed in [ 14 ], by allowing . As for the model specification for γ , we let W = W ( κ 2 ) = exp( γ ) follows the exponential of the respective probability function, assuming κ 2 = σ 2 + ν .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, . In the same vein, an alternative re-parameterization of the COM-Poisson was proposed in [ 14 ], by allowing . As for the model specification for γ , we let W = W ( κ 2 ) = exp( γ ) follows the exponential of the respective probability function, assuming κ 2 = σ 2 + ν .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Ribeiro Jr., Zeviani, Bonat, Demetrio, & Hinde, 2019) instead take the mean approximation provided in Equation ) and backsolve to get λ=μ+ν12νν, and let ϕ = ln( ν ) to establish a second version of a mean‐parametrized CMP (hereafter MCMP2) distribution which has the pmf P()C=c|μ,ϕ=μ+eϕ12eϕitalicceϕ()c!eϕη(),μϕ,1.5emc=0,1,2,, for μ > 0 where η(),μϕ=j=1μ+eϕ12eϕitalicjeϕ/j!eϕ is the normalizing constant. Both Huang (2017) and Ribeiro Jr. et al (2019) note that their respective MCMP parametrizations provide orthogonality between the mean μ and the dispersion (parametrized through ν or ϕ ), yet Ribeiro Jr. et al (2019) argue that the MCMP2 parametrization is simpler given the algebraic approach toward determining μ . At the same time, however, Ribeiro Jr. et al (2019) note that the mean and variance of the MCMP2 are accurate “for a large part of the parameter space.” This statement presumably stems from the recognized constraints necessary to satisfy these approximations; meanwhile, the MCMP1 parametrization does not appear to have any such restrictions.…”
Section: The Conway–maxwell–poisson Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Huang (2017) and Ribeiro Jr. et al (2019) note that their respective MCMP parametrizations provide orthogonality between the mean μ and the dispersion (parametrized through ν or ϕ ), yet Ribeiro Jr. et al (2019) argue that the MCMP2 parametrization is simpler given the algebraic approach toward determining μ . At the same time, however, Ribeiro Jr. et al (2019) note that the mean and variance of the MCMP2 are accurate “for a large part of the parameter space.” This statement presumably stems from the recognized constraints necessary to satisfy these approximations; meanwhile, the MCMP1 parametrization does not appear to have any such restrictions.…”
Section: The Conway–maxwell–poisson Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the involved procedures are proned to numerical problems related to the repeated search (root finding) of the natural location parameter of the distribution. These numerical problems reduce the attractivity of the methods for applied scientists and have yet motivated backup to approximate inference using the CMP distribution [20]. Furthermore, the numerical instability will likely be amplified when extending these regression approaches to the generalized linear mixed model framework [21] to handle multilevel count data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%