“…(Ribeiro Jr., Zeviani, Bonat, Demetrio, & Hinde, 2019) instead take the mean approximation provided in Equation ) and backsolve to get , and let ϕ = ln( ν ) to establish a second version of a mean‐parametrized CMP (hereafter MCMP2) distribution which has the pmf for μ > 0 where is the normalizing constant. Both Huang (2017) and Ribeiro Jr. et al (2019) note that their respective MCMP parametrizations provide orthogonality between the mean μ and the dispersion (parametrized through ν or ϕ ), yet Ribeiro Jr. et al (2019) argue that the MCMP2 parametrization is simpler given the algebraic approach toward determining μ . At the same time, however, Ribeiro Jr. et al (2019) note that the mean and variance of the MCMP2 are accurate “for a large part of the parameter space.” This statement presumably stems from the recognized constraints necessary to satisfy these approximations; meanwhile, the MCMP1 parametrization does not appear to have any such restrictions.…”