2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.20.052035
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability and reproducibility assessment in a large-scale population-based microbiota study: case study on human milk microbiota

Abstract: 38 Background: Quality control including assessment of batch variabilities and confirmation of 39 repeatability and reproducibility are integral component of high throughput omics studies 40 including microbiome research. Batch effects can mask true biological results and/or result in 41 irreproducible conclusions and interpretations. Low biomass samples in microbiome research are 42 prone to reagent contamination; yet, quality control procedures for low biomass samples in large-43 scale microbiome studies are… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Iteratively going through every step, i.e., decontamination using decontam package, checking for abundances in negative controls, and identifying prevalent and dominant contaminants that were abundant in both controls and samples using co-occurrence analysis, aided in removal of a large number of potentially contaminating taxa. While the decontam package identified several contaminants, requirement of additional steps after decontamination have been recently reported, and in our study, we also noticed the importance of detailed investigation of contaminants [27,49]. Furthermore, taxonomic investigation as well as looking for isolation sources for doubtful taxa in well curated public resources like the Bacterial Diversity Metadatabase (BacDive) proved as a useful tool for rational choice on filtering [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Iteratively going through every step, i.e., decontamination using decontam package, checking for abundances in negative controls, and identifying prevalent and dominant contaminants that were abundant in both controls and samples using co-occurrence analysis, aided in removal of a large number of potentially contaminating taxa. While the decontam package identified several contaminants, requirement of additional steps after decontamination have been recently reported, and in our study, we also noticed the importance of detailed investigation of contaminants [27,49]. Furthermore, taxonomic investigation as well as looking for isolation sources for doubtful taxa in well curated public resources like the Bacterial Diversity Metadatabase (BacDive) proved as a useful tool for rational choice on filtering [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Data analysis was conducted in R (R Core Team, 2018) and preprocessing of the ASV table was conducted using the Phyloseq package (McMurdie and Holmes, 2013). Potential reagent contaminants of milk microbiota were identified and removed as previously described (Moossavi et al, 2020). ASVs belonging to the genus Halomonas were highly present in negative controls for the gut microbiota [median read-count (IQR), 214.0 (122.0-271.0)] and thus removed.…”
Section: Quantification and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw sequence data were demultiplexed, denoised, and filtered for chimeric reads with the DADA2 plugin (48) to obtain the frequency table and representative sequence file of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs). After we removed the ASVs considered to be contaminants (49), the decontamination table composed of 353 sample and 5,448 ASVs was downsized to 10,000,000 to standardize sequence depth. We used the representative sequence file for taxonomic annotation using the SILVA database (version 138).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%