2010
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2010.675.677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability of Egg Number and Egg Weight in Two Strains of Layer Type Chicken

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This resulted in decrease in the bird variance and increase in the error variance at different age groups. Lower estimates obtained at different age groups in this study agreed with the report of [17] for egg length and egg shape index. The reverse was however, the case of Sanusi [16] that recorded higher repeatability estimates at peak egg production and low estimates at later periods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This resulted in decrease in the bird variance and increase in the error variance at different age groups. Lower estimates obtained at different age groups in this study agreed with the report of [17] for egg length and egg shape index. The reverse was however, the case of Sanusi [16] that recorded higher repeatability estimates at peak egg production and low estimates at later periods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Ayorinde and Sado [14] also reported repeatability estimates of 0.58–0.60 for egg weight from reports of individual egg weight, taken over a 56 day period from Hubbard layers. These estimates are also corresponding to the estimates of more researchers [12], [14], [15], [16], [17], [9]. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of age variance on repeatability estimates of egg dimensions of Bovan Nera Black laying chickens which was achievable from the use of sensitive digital scale, vernier caliper sensitive to 0.00 cm and Panda [18] formula for measuring performance in each of the traits examined.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Repeatability measures the degree of association between records of the same animal, and is characterized by being expressed more than once in an animal's life (Falconer, 1989), which indicates that repeatability estimates are beneficial in the context of quantitative genetics because they are designed set the upper limits of the levels of genetic variation. The advantage of this for breeding programmes is the increases in the proportion of additive genetic variation and improves the selection response (Udeh, 2010). The low repeatability evaluates reported for egg production parameters were attributed to the huge non genetic factors, Falconer (1989), who believes that the improvements of these traits are desirable that due to their economic importance.…”
Section: Advances Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies on laying hens have demonstrated a relationship between the number of eggs, egg weight and the age as well as the weight of poultry (Bharali et al, 2020;Udeh, 2010;Vlčková et al, 2018;Yusuf et al, 2014;Zemková et al, 2007). With few exceptions, egg weights tend to be low at the beginning of the laying period and then increase with age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%