2014
DOI: 10.1097/opx.0000000000000279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability of Grading Meibomian Gland Dropout Using Two Infrared Systems

Abstract: Observers graded from -1 to +1 grade units between and within themselves for a four-point scale, 95% of the time. Although the interobserver and intraobserver repeatability of the K4 and K5M were very similar, a high rate of disagreement in percentage dropout between K4 and K5M images suggests that the two instruments cannot be interchanged. Meibomian gland dropout scores did not correlate significantly with clinical signs. Using a finer scale may be beneficial for detecting change.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, no data exist on the repeatability and reproducibility of tear meniscus measurements made using the Keratograph though its reliability for measuring corneal power,12 NITBUT14 and grading meibomian gland dropout13 has been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, no data exist on the repeatability and reproducibility of tear meniscus measurements made using the Keratograph though its reliability for measuring corneal power,12 NITBUT14 and grading meibomian gland dropout13 has been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new Keratograph (OculusOptikgerate GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) has several functions such as Placido disk-based corneal topography,12 pupillometry, meibography13 and tear film analysis including non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT)14 and lower TMH (LTMH) measurements. However, the literature lacks data on the repeatability and reproducibility of TMH measurements made using the Keratograph and neither has agreement between this device and other methods like OCT been assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meibography was assessed by everting the lower and upper eyelids and imaging the tarsal plate using the Keratograph ® 5M 24 . The amount of MG dropout from the upper and lower eyelids were was quantified using a grading scale previously described, 25 and summed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It largely eliminated operator bias compared with other devices (4). In addition, screening tests demonstrated that it was able to exactly record the first location of the tear film break-up point and easily observe changes of MG morphology (13,14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%