2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeatability of the Oxford Foot Model in children with foot deformity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome the disadvantage of standard 3D gait analysis, 3D multi-segment foot models, such as the DuPont foot model, Oxford foot model, Milwaukee foot model, Leardini foot model, and Heidelberg foot model, have been increasingly used because they can illustrate the effect of foot and ankle pathologies on intersegmental motion of the foot [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. However, repeatability of the multi-segment foot model is lower in the pediatric population than in the adult population because it is difficult to attach the marker to the correct position in small feet [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the disadvantage of standard 3D gait analysis, 3D multi-segment foot models, such as the DuPont foot model, Oxford foot model, Milwaukee foot model, Leardini foot model, and Heidelberg foot model, have been increasingly used because they can illustrate the effect of foot and ankle pathologies on intersegmental motion of the foot [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. However, repeatability of the multi-segment foot model is lower in the pediatric population than in the adult population because it is difficult to attach the marker to the correct position in small feet [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of pedobarography in assessing clubfeet has shown 14,26 that specific changes in pressure patterns can be used to assess foot function after clubfoot treatment. Validation of the PBS against objective pedobarographic protocols as suggested by Herd et al 14 or the Oxford foot model 27 are necessary to further validate the proposed score in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of marker and configuration choices are likely to be larger than the repeatability errors, which here were an order of magnitude smaller than the values for each segment (compare Tables 1, 2, and A.1). Regardless of marker choice, marker placement consistency and experience are key, as is also true for the measurement of gait kinematics (Caravaggi et al, 2011;McCahill et al, 2018;McGinley et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%