2006
DOI: 10.1101/lm.169306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated acquisitions and extinctions in classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response

Abstract: The rabbit nictitating membrane (NM) response underwent successive stages of acquisition and extinction training in both delay (Experiment 1) and trace (Experiment 2) classical conditioning. In both cases, successive acquisitions became progressively faster, although the largest, most reliable acceleration occurred between the first and second acquisition. Successive extinctions were similar in rate. The results challenge contextual control theories of extinction but are consistent with attentional and layered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously found for extinction (Napier et al 1992;Kehoe 2006) Despite large changes in magnitude, the timing of the CR peak and duration appeared to change very little. To provide a picture without averaging artifacts, four temporal features of each The time course of CRs constructed by averaging the momentary NM readings for all rabbits at successive 5-msec time points after CS onset on CS-alone trials within each of the specified days in each phase.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As previously found for extinction (Napier et al 1992;Kehoe 2006) Despite large changes in magnitude, the timing of the CR peak and duration appeared to change very little. To provide a picture without averaging artifacts, four temporal features of each The time course of CRs constructed by averaging the momentary NM readings for all rabbits at successive 5-msec time points after CS onset on CS-alone trials within each of the specified days in each phase.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…In extinction, the magnitude measures plotted in Figure 3 indicate that most responding occurred on the first day, with only brief periods of spontaneous recovery subsequently (Napier et al 1992;Kehoe 2006). Thus, linear regressions were conducted for both the first day alone and all 6 d. The lower portion of Table 1 indicates that, across both sets of regressions, the onset latency showed a significant increase across trials (P's , 0.001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent re-acquisition could also use both pathways and be faster that initial acquisition (not shown). This type of hysteresis has been observed both for VOR gain adaptation [26,28,29] and eyeblink conditioning [30,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Again, the key comparisons are the rates of extinction on the postmuscimol session vs. the control 1 session and vs. the control 2 session. These within-animal comparisons are possible, because previous studies have shown that repeated rounds of extinction and reacquisition do not appreciably change the rate of trace response extinction (Kehoe 2006).…”
Section: Disrupting Cerebellar Mechanisms Of Extinction Prevents Extimentioning
confidence: 99%