2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated Cocaine Administration Decreases Calcineurin (PP2B) but Enhances DARPP-32 Modulation of Sodium Currents in Rat Nucleus Accumbens Neurons

Abstract: Our previous studies have demonstrated that repeated cocaine (COC) administration reduces voltage-sensitive sodium and calcium currents (I Na or VSSCs and I Ca or VSCCs, respectively) in medium spiny nucleus accumbens (NAc) neurons of rats. The present findings further indicate that chronic COC-induced I Na reduction in NAc neurons is regulated by decreased dephosphorylation and enhanced phosphorylation of Na þ channels. Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings revealed that dephosphorylation of Na þ channels by ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of the calcineurin inhibitor, cyclosporine, to potentiate both the locomotor response to acute cocaine exposure and the early response to repeated cocaine exposure suggests that calcineurin is part of a feedback pathway that limits the effects of cocaine. This is consistent with previous work showing decreased calcineurin expression in the nucleus accumbens of rats after repeated cocaine exposure and withdrawal (Hu et al 2005). Similarly, calcineurin over-expression in the mouse forebrain disrupts locomotor sensitization and the conditioned place preference associated with the administration of amphetamine, another psychostimulant (Biala et al 2005), suggesting that increased calcineurin activity may have more general effects that limit psychostimulant action.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The ability of the calcineurin inhibitor, cyclosporine, to potentiate both the locomotor response to acute cocaine exposure and the early response to repeated cocaine exposure suggests that calcineurin is part of a feedback pathway that limits the effects of cocaine. This is consistent with previous work showing decreased calcineurin expression in the nucleus accumbens of rats after repeated cocaine exposure and withdrawal (Hu et al 2005). Similarly, calcineurin over-expression in the mouse forebrain disrupts locomotor sensitization and the conditioned place preference associated with the administration of amphetamine, another psychostimulant (Biala et al 2005), suggesting that increased calcineurin activity may have more general effects that limit psychostimulant action.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…N-and R-type calcium channel activity is also reduced (Zhang et al, 2002). Sodium channel phosphorylation is enhanced (Hu et al, 2005), leading to a reduction in sodium channel activation (Zhang et al, 1998). These multiple alterations likely converge to regulate the net output from the NAcc after cocaine administration.…”
Section: Contingent and Noncontingent Psychostimulant Administration mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulating evidence suggests that a common feature of many drugs of abuse is that they produce alterations in excitatory signaling, both directly through the regulation of synaptic function (Lu et al, 1997Hyman and Malenka, 2001;Winder et al, 2002;Lovinger et al, 2003), and indirectly through the regulation of cellular excitability (Zhang et al, 2002;Hu et al, 2004Hu et al, , 2005 in reward circuitry. Evidence to date suggests that psychostimulants differentially regulate glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), two key components of the reward circuitry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these pre-and postsynaptic neuroadaptations have been characterized under experimental conditions that are quite different from those of the present study. However, certain are expected to be inhibitory (eg Hu et al, 2005;McClung and Nestler, 2003;Nestler, 2005). Others are expected to be excitatory (Pierce et al, 1996;Grimm et al, 2003;Boudreau and Wolf, 2005;McClung and Nestler, 2003;Ferrario et al, 2005).…”
Section: Core Vs Shellmentioning
confidence: 99%