2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2011.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated eastward shifts of arc magmatism in the Southern Andes: A revision to the long-term pattern of Andean uplift and magmatism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
89
0
17

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
8
89
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…4). In the Patagonian Andes Cretaceous arc migration had been previously attributed to a shallowing of the subducted slab (Barcat et al, 1989;Suárez et al, 2009a, Folguera andRamos, 2011). In this context, it is worth noting the close spatial and temporal relation between the broken foreland sector, the development of the Chubut Group Basin, the magmatic arc migration and the series of mid ocean ridge collisions ( Fig.4 and 14).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4). In the Patagonian Andes Cretaceous arc migration had been previously attributed to a shallowing of the subducted slab (Barcat et al, 1989;Suárez et al, 2009a, Folguera andRamos, 2011). In this context, it is worth noting the close spatial and temporal relation between the broken foreland sector, the development of the Chubut Group Basin, the magmatic arc migration and the series of mid ocean ridge collisions ( Fig.4 and 14).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The 150-140 Ma extensional stage was dominated by three general structural trends: NNW (black lines), WNW (green lines) and minor E-W (red lines). Later, since ~120 Ma, a slab shallowing event is suggested by magmatic arc expansion at the time of development of a broad broken foreland.At this time compression reactivated the E-W and WNW structures of the San Jorge Gulf Basinin a syncontractional mode (modified fromFolguera and Ramos, 2011). B.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). It is important to highlight that all of the tectonic structures described in this study are related to the synrift extension and that many of them were partially reactivated during the positive inversion (for reviews see Cooper & Williams 1989;McClay 1995) that occurred during Miocene time (Folguera & Ramos 2011), so extensional faults were reactivated in the opposite sense to their original movement, partially uplifting and deforming the synrift strata but preserving the original strike and dip. New faults that originated during the Andean orogeny were mapped, but they were not analysed in the study (Figs 2 and 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is identifiable because its faulted margins were partially inverted and uplifted during the basin inversion ( Fig. 2a) that occurred in this part of the Andes mainly during Miocene time (Folguera & Ramos 2011), but that preserved its half-graben geometry (Fig. 2c).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A) records, in part, development of the Patagonian fold-andthrust belt that began by the latest Cretaceous or early Paleogene, and transformed the basin from an early Mesozoic backarc basin to a retroarc foreland basin (Suárez et al, 2000). From the late Cretaceous through the late Miocene, progressive eastward migration of retroarc deformation resulted in uplift and volcanic-arc expansion (Thomson et al, 2001;Folguera and Ramos, 2011).…”
Section: Regional Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%