1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199804)12:2<119::aid-acp500>3.0.co;2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated testing in eyewitness memory: a means to improve recall of a negative emotional event

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from past work, however, have provided inconsistent support for this thesis. Specifically, some studies show that arousal decreases the accuracy of eyewitness identifications (Deffenbacher et al, 2004;Stanny & Johnson, 2000), whereas others suggest that arousal may enhance memory performance (Bornstein, Liebel, & Scarberry, 1998).…”
Section: Estimator Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from past work, however, have provided inconsistent support for this thesis. Specifically, some studies show that arousal decreases the accuracy of eyewitness identifications (Deffenbacher et al, 2004;Stanny & Johnson, 2000), whereas others suggest that arousal may enhance memory performance (Bornstein, Liebel, & Scarberry, 1998).…”
Section: Estimator Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the same discrete details reliably identified by Bornstein et al (1998) in each version of the film were used to code participants' responses. There were 45 details in the arousing version and 43 details in the neutral condition.…”
Section: Coding and Preliminary Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequence of events in arousing and neutral clip versions for Experiment 2 (Bornstein et al, 1998) Beginning segment -both versions (18 details) 1. Occurred during the day 2.…”
Section: Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have shown that arousing stimuli can interfere with memory for spatially or temporally nearby neutral items (Bornstein, Liebel, & Scarberry, 1998;Detterman & Ellis, 1972;Ellis et al, 1971;Erdelyi & Blumenthal, 1973;Hadley & MacKay, 2006;Hurlemann et al, 2005;Johnson et al, 2005;MacKay et al, 2004;Miu, Heilman, Opre, & Miclea, 2005;Runcie & O'Bannon, 1977;Schmidt, 2002;Strange, Hurlemann, & Dolan, 2003). Although some of these studies used very rapid presentation, item memory impairment for temporally adjacent items also has been found with up to three or four seconds between the arousing and neutral items (Detterman & Ellis, 1972;Hurlemann et al, 2005;Runcie & O'Bannon, 1977) and sometimes even for items appearing six seconds after an arousing item (Schmidt, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%