2011
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated Unidirectional Introgression of Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA Between Four Congeneric Tanganyikan Cichlids

Abstract: With an increasing number of reported cases of hybridization and introgression, interspecific gene flow between animals has recently become a widely accepted and broadly studied phenomenon. In this study, we examine patterns of hybridization and introgression in Ophthalmotilapia spp., a genus of cichlid fish from Lake Tanganyika, using mitochondrial and nuclear DNA from all four species in the genus and including specimens from over 800 km of shoreline. These four species have very different, partially overlap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the deep nuclear DNA (ncDNA) divergence between the northern and southern lineages, this pattern in mtDNA is difficult to explain. On the other hand, evidence is accumulating that the replacement of mtDNA across large geographic distances, without apparent signatures of nuclear genomic admixis is more common than previously thought (e.g., Good, Vanderpool, Keeble, & Bi, 2015; Melo‐Ferreira, Seixas, Cheng, Mills, & Alves, 2014; Nevado, Fazalova, Backeljau, Hanssens, & Verheyen, 2011; Tang, Liu, Yu, Liu, & Danley, 2012). More general, discordance between nuclear and mtDNA phylogenetic inferences is known from many freshwater fish taxa and attributed to their high propensity to hybridize (see Wallis et al., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the deep nuclear DNA (ncDNA) divergence between the northern and southern lineages, this pattern in mtDNA is difficult to explain. On the other hand, evidence is accumulating that the replacement of mtDNA across large geographic distances, without apparent signatures of nuclear genomic admixis is more common than previously thought (e.g., Good, Vanderpool, Keeble, & Bi, 2015; Melo‐Ferreira, Seixas, Cheng, Mills, & Alves, 2014; Nevado, Fazalova, Backeljau, Hanssens, & Verheyen, 2011; Tang, Liu, Yu, Liu, & Danley, 2012). More general, discordance between nuclear and mtDNA phylogenetic inferences is known from many freshwater fish taxa and attributed to their high propensity to hybridize (see Wallis et al., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently STRUCTURE has been used [44], [45] to quantify in more details the proportion of individual's genome originating from a different hybridizing species in tilapia from Lake Victoria and in Cichlids from Lake Tanganyika, respectively. Results obtained by these authors concern tilapia species from the Lake Victoria region: O. niloticus and O. esculentus .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such recent speciation is unusual for Lake Tanganyika cichlids, in which species typically represent reciprocally monophyletic lineages separated by substantial genetic distances (Koblmüller et al, 2004(Koblmüller et al, , 2007cDuftner et al, 2005), except when subject to interspecific introgression (e.g. Rüber et al, 2001;Koblmüller et al, 2007b;Sturmbauer et al, 2010;Nevado et al, 2011). Divergence between the two Altolamprologus species was inferred to have proceeded with little if any gene flow (Table 2), which attributes their polyphyletic relationship mainly to incomplete lineage sorting.…”
Section: Recently Diverged Species With Similar Demographic Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitochondrial replacement in isolated populations and even in entire species is being inferred in an increasing number of taxa (e.g. Nevado et al, 2011;Tang et al, 2012;Melo-Ferreira et al, 2014;Good et al, 2015), including lamprologines (Schelly et al, 2006;Nevado et al, 2009). Lamprologine species can produce interspecific offspring for long periods of time following their divergence (Koblmüller et al, 2007b;Sturmbauer et al, 2010), which may explain the frequency of interspecific introgressions detected in this group.…”
Section: Ancient Interspecific Introgression Into Northern a Compresmentioning
confidence: 99%