2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04442.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeated unidirectional introgression towardsPopulus balsamiferain contact zones of exotic and native poplars

Abstract: Repeated unidirectional introgression towards Populus balsamifera in contact zones of exotic and native poplarsThompson, S.L.; Lamothe, M.; Meirmans, P.G.; Périnet, P.; Isabel, N. General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
90
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
10
90
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although STRUCTURE is best known for its ability to discern the number of population clusters (but see Kalinowski 2011), it can also be used as a powerful tool to detect admixture when the number of species is known in advance (Vaha and Primmer 2006;Thompson et al 2010), as is the case here. Since three species have been described we started by running the analysis with K = 3 using the AFLP data of the uniform populations only to see if the morphologically defined species were also genetically separated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although STRUCTURE is best known for its ability to discern the number of population clusters (but see Kalinowski 2011), it can also be used as a powerful tool to detect admixture when the number of species is known in advance (Vaha and Primmer 2006;Thompson et al 2010), as is the case here. Since three species have been described we started by running the analysis with K = 3 using the AFLP data of the uniform populations only to see if the morphologically defined species were also genetically separated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These populations contained not only putative F1 individuals that showed approximately 50 % admixture between two species, but also backcrossed individuals and even some individuals that showed admixture between all three parental species. Such complex patterns of hybridization are usually interpreted as evidence that hybridization has been going on for several generations (Lepais et al 2009;Thompson et al 2010).…”
Section: Hybridization In Pericallismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been used for a range of genetic studies (for example, Tian et al, 2011). An alternative for SNP typing is the Sequenom MassARRAY platform (Hamburg, Germany), which uses single termination mix multiplexed PCR and identifies different SNPs based on their different masses (applied by Thompson et al, 2009). For phylogenetic analyses, 9000 informative SNPs were used to produce a well-supported phylogeny for the bacterial genus Brucella, with markers designed from whole genomes, with rigorous qualitycontrol checks to ensure orthology (Foster et al, 2009).…”
Section: How Can Ngs Technologies Help Us To Get Around These Limitatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-scale SNP typing is already used for evolutionary model systems, such as Populus, where 35 diagnostic SNPs have been assayed for 635 individuals (Thompson et al, 2009); however, NGS will aid marker design and application for systems with no current genomic resources. Focused studies of hybrid swarms should be expanded to include samples from across a species ranges, in order to accurately assess the degree of admixture and introgression.…”
Section: How Can Ngs Best Be Used To Study Hybridization and Introgrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thompson et al 2010;Millar et al 2012), and in some groups including eucalypts and pines, this is largely attributed to weak intrinsic reproductive barriers (e.g. Ledig 1998;Potts et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%