2015
DOI: 10.1002/mus.24428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repeater F‐waves are signs of motor unit pathology in polio survivors

Abstract: Introduction The purpose of this study was to determine whether F‐waves reveal electrophysiological features of anterior horn cells in polio survivors. Methods Forty‐three polio survivors and 20 healthy controls underwent motor nerve conduction studies of the median and tibial nerves bilaterally, including sampling of F‐waves elicited by 100 stimuli and the determination of motor unit number estimation (MUNE). Results A significant increase i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in the percentage of upper limb onset between groups 1 and 2 may underlie a different pattern of disease progression between the two groups. The estimated number of motor units and CMAP amplitudes are useful parameters for evaluating motoneuron loss, whereas the F-wave may be a direct probe of dysfunction or instability in anterior horn cells (Hachisuka et al, 2015 ). The F-wave persistence is related to the number of LMNs and motoneuron excitability (Schiller and Stalberg, 1978 ; de Carvalho et al, 2002 ; Argyriou et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The difference in the percentage of upper limb onset between groups 1 and 2 may underlie a different pattern of disease progression between the two groups. The estimated number of motor units and CMAP amplitudes are useful parameters for evaluating motoneuron loss, whereas the F-wave may be a direct probe of dysfunction or instability in anterior horn cells (Hachisuka et al, 2015 ). The F-wave persistence is related to the number of LMNs and motoneuron excitability (Schiller and Stalberg, 1978 ; de Carvalho et al, 2002 ; Argyriou et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F-wave persistence is related to the number of LMNs and motoneuron excitability (Schiller and Stalberg, 1978 ; de Carvalho et al, 2002 ; Argyriou et al, 2006 ). The proposed mechanisms underlying repeater F-waves are increased excitability in particular anterior horn cells, decreased excitability in some motoneurons, or motoneuron loss (Schiller and Stalberg, 1978 ; Petajan, 1985 ; Peioglou-Harmoussi et al, 1987 ; Hachisuka et al, 2015 ). As motoneurons are lost, repeater F-waves from individual motoneurons may be recognized more easily; however, it has been argued that the low frequency of backfiring of individual motoneurons makes the mechanism rather unlikely (Chroni et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CMAP amplitude are useful parameters for evaluating motor neuron loss, whereas the F-wave may be a direct probe of dysfunction or instability in upper motor neurons disorder (22). These results indicate that this estimate probably reflects the significance of F-wave parameters in SCA3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%