2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

90
1,812
6
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,098 publications
(1,951 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
90
1,812
6
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This proposition is in line with recent models of neuronal repetition priming (Desimone, 1996;Grill-Spector et al, 2006;Henson, 2003;Wiggs and Martin, 1998), suggesting that the repeated exposure to a given stimulus leads to a more efficient cortical representation -a mechanism termed sharpening. In this regard, the direct comparison of children and older adults is particularly informative.…”
Section: Lifespan Differences In Sensory Coding Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This proposition is in line with recent models of neuronal repetition priming (Desimone, 1996;Grill-Spector et al, 2006;Henson, 2003;Wiggs and Martin, 1998), suggesting that the repeated exposure to a given stimulus leads to a more efficient cortical representation -a mechanism termed sharpening. In this regard, the direct comparison of children and older adults is particularly informative.…”
Section: Lifespan Differences In Sensory Coding Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Instead of reflecting the feedback from higher‐level brain areas, the BOLD‐reductions observed in this study could alternatively reflect locally originating modulations of neural activity (Grill‐Spector, Henson, & Martin, 2006; Henson, 2003). The decreased BOLD activity together with increased speech intelligibility may be explained, for example, with the sharpening model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The decreased BOLD activity together with increased speech intelligibility may be explained, for example, with the sharpening model. This proposes that neurons coding word‐specific information send inhibitory feedback to the neurons coding features that are not essential for word identification, and that this results in a sparser and more specific neural representation of the word (Grill‐Spector et al., 2006; Henson, 2003; Wiggs & Martin, 1998). Further, these word‐specific memory representations might encode invariant global acoustic features of a word formulated as an average of the exposures to the various acoustic forms of that word during the subject's lifespan (Gagnepain et al., 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we suggest that repetition of a stimulus causes a decrease in population activity, and a change to a new stimulus activates a different neural population that fires robustly Hamilton and Grafton, 2006. This interpretation does not require a strict concordance between RSdefined selectivity of the population response and the selectivity of single neurons [Grill-Spector et al, 2006;Sawamura et al, 2006]. Instead, population level RS can be interpreted analogous to the double dissociation paradigm in neuropsychology.…”
Section: Neurophysiological Mechanisms Of Motor Rsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…An alternative is to measure the repetition suppression (RS) of the fMRI blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal when a particular stimulus feature is repeated from one trial to the next [Grill-Spector et al, 2006]. The RS method, also known as fMRI-adaptation, is promising because it is not limited to visual systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%