2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repetition priming effects from attended vs. ignored single words in a semantic categorization task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
33
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…But although overt manifestations of negative priming may depend on attentional conflicts at test, this obviously cannot change the critical effect of attention at initial exposure. Moreover, behavioral effects typically result from a balance between concurrent processes with potentially opposing positive and negative influences (Ortells, Fox, Noguera, & Abad, 2003;Neumann & DeSchepper, 1991), whereas such opposing influences might more easily be disentangled using fMRI if they affect distinct brain sites. It is possible that if repetition enhancement in the lingual cortex relate to negative priming effects, such effects might have become apparent behaviorally in some other task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…But although overt manifestations of negative priming may depend on attentional conflicts at test, this obviously cannot change the critical effect of attention at initial exposure. Moreover, behavioral effects typically result from a balance between concurrent processes with potentially opposing positive and negative influences (Ortells, Fox, Noguera, & Abad, 2003;Neumann & DeSchepper, 1991), whereas such opposing influences might more easily be disentangled using fMRI if they affect distinct brain sites. It is possible that if repetition enhancement in the lingual cortex relate to negative priming effects, such effects might have become apparent behaviorally in some other task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, the effect might even completely reverse in such a way that responses to incongruent prime-target pairs are faster than to congruent pairs (Merikle and Joordens, 1997; Daza et al, 2002), because subjects are able to strategically use the prime information to predict the upcoming target category. Even for conscious trials this might take some time (∼400 ms), suggesting that these strategic effects take some time to build up (Ortells et al, 2003). These conscious strategic effects were recently only observed for spatially attended stimuli, but not for unattended ones (Ortells et al, 2011).…”
Section: Conscious Awareness and Top-down Cognitive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the ignored material is subject to impaired processing (Frings & Wentura, 2005;Milliken, Joordens, Merikle, & Seiffert, 1998;Neill & Kahan, 1999;Ortells, Fox, Noguera, & Abad, 2003;Tipper, 1985;Tipper & Cranston, 1985). For example, responses are slower and less accurate to a previously ignored object than to a new object.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%