2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.593000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Cognitive Function in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an early stage of Alzheimer's disease. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been widely employed in MCI research. However, there is no reliable systematic evidence regarding the effects of rTMS on MCI. The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rTMS in the treatment of MCI.Methods: A comprehensive literature search of nine electronic databases was performed to identify articles published in English or Chinese before June 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the cognitive training might be able to modulate the effect of rTMS, and might explain why the rTMS studies with cognitive training seemed to be more consistent than those studies without cognitive training. Besides, our current subgroup analysis of session number revealed that rTMS with more than 20 sessions might be able to produce cognitive enhancement in patients with MCI or early AD, which is consistent with previous studies (Lin et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2020;Jiang et al, 2021). However, the effect size of trials with 30 sessions seemed to be smaller than the effect size of trials with 20 session and with 40 sessions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the cognitive training might be able to modulate the effect of rTMS, and might explain why the rTMS studies with cognitive training seemed to be more consistent than those studies without cognitive training. Besides, our current subgroup analysis of session number revealed that rTMS with more than 20 sessions might be able to produce cognitive enhancement in patients with MCI or early AD, which is consistent with previous studies (Lin et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2020;Jiang et al, 2021). However, the effect size of trials with 30 sessions seemed to be smaller than the effect size of trials with 20 session and with 40 sessions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A series of literature has suggested the positive effects of rTMS on AD patients and with the growing body of the rTMS studies in MCI and AD recently, several meta-analyses have investigated the effects of rTMS in older adults with MCI or AD and demonstrated a beneficial effect of rTMS on the cognitive function of patients (Lin et al, 2019;Chou et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020;Jiang et al, 2021). However, most of them included patients within different stages of AD and resulted in large variety of pretreatment cognitive capability (Lin et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effectiveness of high-frequency rTMS treatment has been examined in clinical studies. Notably, patients diagnosed with early stage AD received rTMS stimulation bilaterally to the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex showed cognitive improvement relative to their baseline state while patients with sham treatment showed no improvement [ 32 , 58 ]. Together with our findings that rTMS treatment prevented the cognitive decline in 5xFAD mice, we hypothesize that the still limited accumulation of toxic Aβ, neuroinflammation and neuronal damage at early stage of AD may allow for better therapeutic effect of rTMS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies included patients with MCI and AD in most previous meta-analyses, and few studies analyzed patients with MCI independently (Chou et al, 2020 ). A recent meta-analysis reported the effect of rTMS on cognition in patients with MCI (Jiang et al, 2020 ), but the studies included were not exclusively randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Furthermore, different interventions were used as controls in some of the included studies, indicating high heterogeneity across the studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%