1952
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-195210000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replacement of Mucous Membrane of Urinary Bladder With Thick-Split Grafts of Skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Autologous tissue has been experimented on for bladder repair since the early 1980s (41). The use of omentum, pericardium, stomach and skin has been attempted with limited success (42)(43)(44)(45). It was the lack of watertight properties Figure 1.…”
Section: Biomaterials In Bladder Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autologous tissue has been experimented on for bladder repair since the early 1980s (41). The use of omentum, pericardium, stomach and skin has been attempted with limited success (42)(43)(44)(45). It was the lack of watertight properties Figure 1.…”
Section: Biomaterials In Bladder Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autologous tissues have been tested for bladder repair before the standard use of intestinal segment in the beginning of the eighties [1]. The skin, the omentum, the stomach, the pericardium have been used with very limited success [39][40][41][42]. Indeed, the epithelium of these tissues is not specialized in watertight function.…”
Section: Natural Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skin, the omentum, the stomach, the pericardium, representing native substitutes (Draper & Stark 1956, Goldstein et al 1967, Andretto et al 1981, Nguyen & Mitchell 1991, but also silicone, polyvinyl and Teflon, for the alloplastic materials (Kudish 1957, Bogash et al 1960, Kelami et al 1970), but they quickly encountered significant complications. The absence of biocompatibility, vascularization and the immunogenicity of some of these substitutes, as well as the direct contact with the toxic urine, lead mainly to the formation of fibrosis and contraction of the graft (Burbige & Hensle 1986, Vemulakonda et al 2008.…”
Section: Bladdermentioning
confidence: 99%