1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)35155-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replacement of the transverse aortic arch during emergency operations for type A acute aortic dissection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aortic arch replacement to treat an arch tear in a type A aortic dissection is controversial. 17,19,22,23 Some authors believe that a postoperatively persistent patent false lumen is an inevitable result of the pathology. However, others have indicated that resection of the primary tear on the aortic arch could reduce the patency rate.…”
Section: Patent False Lumen Over Descending Aortamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aortic arch replacement to treat an arch tear in a type A aortic dissection is controversial. 17,19,22,23 Some authors believe that a postoperatively persistent patent false lumen is an inevitable result of the pathology. However, others have indicated that resection of the primary tear on the aortic arch could reduce the patency rate.…”
Section: Patent False Lumen Over Descending Aortamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] Because the residual dissection of the descending aorta carries the risk of progressive aneurysmal dilation, 7 subsequent aortic reintervention of the descending aorta may be necessary, influencing the long-term benefits of the initial surgery. [8][9][10] A more aggressive initial treatment with total arch repair, possibly with adjunct therapy of the descending aorta obliterating the false lumen, is propagated by several groups to decrease the incidence of late aortic complications. [11][12][13] However, other groups have demonstrated an increased risk of morbidity and mortality with extensive surgery of the downstream aorta, thus recommending a more conservative strategy limited to the ascending aorta and proximal arch.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ascending aorta replacement or hemi-arch replacement is the traditional surgical method to treat Stanford type A aortic dissection [1][2][3][4] For 50%-70% of patients suffering from type A aortic dissection, blood flow is still present in the false lumen of the descending aorta, which may cause dilation of the aorta, and about 13%-15% of such patients will need a second surgery within five years [12][13][14][15][16]. To improve the therapeutic effect and reduce the reoperation rate, entire arch replacement combined with FET has been increasingly used for type A aortic dissection [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%