2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replacing Barley and Soybean Meal With By-products, in a Pasture Based Diet, Alters Daily Methane Output and the Rumen Microbial Community in vitro Using the Rumen Simulation Technique (RUSITEC)

Abstract: Plant based by-products (BP) produced from food and bioethanol industries are human inedible, but can be recycled into the global food chain by ruminant livestock. However, limited data is available on the methanogenesis potential associated with supplementing a solely BP formulated concentrate to a pastoral based diet. Therefore the objective of this in vitro study was to investigate the effects of BP inclusion rate (in a formulated concentrate) to a pasture based diet on dietary digestibility, rumen fermenta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reducing CH 4 emissions, therefore, not only improves the environmental sustainability but also the efficiency of both dairy and beef cattle production systems. As such, numerous mitigation strategies for the reduction of CH 4 have been developed, including the use of feed additives ( Gao et al, 2011 ; Smith et al, 2020 ; Almeida et al, 2021 ), nutritional management practices such as increased feed quality ( Beauchemin et al, 2008 ), indirect genetic selection, for example, residual feed intake to reduce methane emissions per kilogram of product and animal performance improvements in milk yields and meat production ( O’Brien et al, 2016 ; Thompson and Rowntree, 2020 ), and direct genetic selection for reduced emissions ( Donoghue et al, 2016a ; González-Recio et al, 2020 ; Lassen and Difford, 2020 ; de Haas et al, 2021 ; Manzanilla-Pech et al, 2021 ). However, before mitigation strategies relating to genetic selection can be implemented, a clear understanding of the CH 4 phenotype and associated measurement methods is first required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing CH 4 emissions, therefore, not only improves the environmental sustainability but also the efficiency of both dairy and beef cattle production systems. As such, numerous mitigation strategies for the reduction of CH 4 have been developed, including the use of feed additives ( Gao et al, 2011 ; Smith et al, 2020 ; Almeida et al, 2021 ), nutritional management practices such as increased feed quality ( Beauchemin et al, 2008 ), indirect genetic selection, for example, residual feed intake to reduce methane emissions per kilogram of product and animal performance improvements in milk yields and meat production ( O’Brien et al, 2016 ; Thompson and Rowntree, 2020 ), and direct genetic selection for reduced emissions ( Donoghue et al, 2016a ; González-Recio et al, 2020 ; Lassen and Difford, 2020 ; de Haas et al, 2021 ; Manzanilla-Pech et al, 2021 ). However, before mitigation strategies relating to genetic selection can be implemented, a clear understanding of the CH 4 phenotype and associated measurement methods is first required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC) system designed by Czerkawski and Breckenridge (1977) has been used to assess dietary feed additives such as tannins, essential oils, plant secondary metabolites (Tedeschi et al, 2022), and seaweeds (Belanche et al, 2016a) on total gas output, CH 4 production, digestibility parameters (Smith et al, 2020), and volatile fatty acid (VFA) production (Castro-Montoya et al, 2012). This system is an ideal example of both the reduction and refinement concepts for animal science experimentation, whereby feed additives can be screened for their antimethanogenic properties prior to being brought forward to in vivo animal experiments, which can be expensive, time consuming and labour intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, this issue may be overcome by formulating rations from a combination of BPs, with both Whelan et al (212) and Condren et al (213) reporting no differences in N excretion between dairy cows receiving a barely and soybean meal supplemented ration in comparison with a BP ration formulated from DDGS, palm kernel expeller, and soyhulls. Indeed, the same BP formulation was also shown to reduce CH 4 output by ∼20% (both daily and per unit of OMD) without negatively impacting members of the rumen microbiota when supplemented with a pasture-based diet in vitro (199).…”
Section: Increasing the Lipid Content Of The Supplemented Rationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, rumen microbes possess a limited ability to ferment lipids (198). As a result, the addition of lipids to the diet, at the expense of other carbohydrate sources, likely results in a lower availability of fermentable substrate, leading to less VFA, H 2 , and ultimately CH 4 production per unit of intake and/or digestibility (199). The supplementation of lipids has been identified as a costly CH 4 mitigation strategy (103), which may limit its use due to its economic viability (10).…”
Section: Increasing the Lipid Content Of The Supplemented Rationmentioning
confidence: 99%