Replicability and Comprehensibility of Social Research and Its Technical Implementation

Friedhoff, Stefan; Verl, Christian Meier zu; Pietsch, Christian; Meyer, Christian; Vompras, Johanna; Liebig, Stefan

doi:10.2139/ssrn.2272056

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Nesse sentido, alguns estudos discutem a importância de a política editorial definir um padrão e a granularidade dos artigos de dados, pois o principal objetivo do artigo de dados é o reuso, daí a importância de se apresentar todas as informações sobre os conjuntos de dados e/ou metadados, além de permitir rastreamento do impacto desses trabalhos (REES, 2010; COSTELLO; MICHENER; GAHEGAN; ZHANG; BOURNE, 2013; ATICI; KANSA; LEV-TOV; KANSA, 2013;FRIEDHOFF;MEIER ZU VERL;PIETSCH, 2013;TASK...., 2013;CHEN, 2017;COUSIJN et. al., 2018;KIM;YAKEL;FANIEL, 2019;DARCH, 2020).…”

Section: )unclassified

Artigos de dados: conceitos e tendências no cenário editorial

Schiessl

Shintaku

2022

InCID: Rev. Ci. Inf. Doc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A evolução tecnológica é um dos fatores que têm impactado as atividades científicas, em especial a comunicação científica, com o surgimento de novas práticas e tipos de publicação, a exemplo dos artigos de dados. Entretanto, mesmo que não seja novidade, muitos editores ainda não estão familiarizados com esse tipo de artigo, visto que grande parte das políticas editoriais brasileiras não o contempla. Assim, o presente trabalho tem por objetivo ser uma revisão sobre artigos de dados, a fim de compilar informações a respeito do tema. Para tanto, utiliza levantamento bibliográfico e documental, por meio do Google Acadêmico. Os resultados apontam que artigo de dados já possui uma definição estabelecida, mesmo que não seja adequado para todos os tipos de dados, mas que é primordial para o reuso de dados de pesquisa. Da mesma forma, que o reuso dos dados pode alterar de algum jeito as atividades da pesquisa, requerendo ser divulgado para que possa ser adotada por mais pesquisadores.

show abstract

Section: )unclassified

Artigos de dados: conceitos e tendências no cenário editorial

Schiessl

Shintaku

2022

InCID: Rev. Ci. Inf. Doc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A researcher cannot be reasonably expected to construct a questionnaire including hundreds of thousands of questions on his own, as well as, collect the data and analyze it. Friedhoff et al (2013) argued that during the analysis phase, many mistakes occur and some researchers who are not familiar with statistical programs conduct research with office programs whose purpose is not to conduct social research. Therefore, the researcher's ability as well as other mystery factors affect whether the data has been analyzed accurately.…”

Section: Replication As An Ideal: the Quantitative-qualitative Debatementioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, none of them have been able to achieve replication in any way whether it be empirical, conceptual, or otherwise. Again, Friedhoff et al (2013) emphasized the possibility of replicating qualitative studies while highlighting important obstacles. According to him, the documentation of the data required for replication is difficult to produce in qualitative studies (Friedhoff et al, 2013, p. 3).…”

Section: Replication As An Ideal: the Quantitative-qualitative Debatementioning

confidence: 99%

Replicability: 21st Century Crisis of the Positivist Social Sciences

Kalelioğlu¹

2021

Uluslararası Sosyal Bilgilerde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi (IJONASS)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Replicability in social research forms the essence of the positivist attempt to discover the universal and self-supporting method of the exploration of "truth". However, the principle of replication as a meta-judge which is regarded as the legitimate baseline of science raises certain difficulties where the object of research is not independent of the researcher. The replication crisis is an ongoing methodological crisis that has emerged as a result of the failure of experiments on the repetition of social psychology-based studies. The crisis has deeply shaken the medical, natural, social, and further positivist sciences which in general work with the replicability principle. The aim of this paper is to identify the replicability issue as the latest methodological discussion in the social sciences in line with the critiques of positivism that marked the 20th century to demonstrate which scholars and schools of thought criticized the positivistic principles of replicability and universality, and to show whether these principles are still a topic of debate in 21st century social sciences. As a result of the study, it is concluded that positivist claims: replication and universality principles lose their validity in sociology due to ontological, epistemological, individual and structural aspects.

show abstract

Replicability and Comprehensibility of Social Research and Its Technical Implementation

Cited by 2 publications

References 8 publications

Artigos de dados: conceitos e tendências no cenário editorial

Artigos de dados: conceitos e tendências no cenário editorial

Replicability: 21st Century Crisis of the Positivist Social Sciences

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About