2021
DOI: 10.2196/30533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replicating Anatomical Teaching Specimens Using 3D Modeling Embedded Within a Multimodal e-Learning Course: Pre-Post Study Exploring the Impact on Medical Education During COVID-19

Abstract: Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant effects on anatomy education. During the pandemic, students have had no access to cadavers, which has been the principal method of learning anatomy. We created and tested a customized congenital heart disease e-learning course for medical students that contained interactive 3D models of anonymized pediatric congenital heart defects. Objective The aim of this study is to assess whether a multimodal e-l… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alongside the use of multimodal physical tools (e.g., anatomy models, 3D‐printed models, and cadavers), digital resources were utilized to improve the accessibility of online learning. These digital resources included software, massive open online courses or MOOCs, anatomical images, digital histology slides, YouTube and other online videos, virtual and augmented reality simulations, digitized live‐streamed cadaveric dissections, virtual laboratory workspaces, virtual worksheets, and mobile applications (Srinivasan, 2020; Bernigau et al, 2021; Böckers et al, 2021; Chan et al, 2021; Griepp et al, 2021; Harmon et al, 2021; John et al, 2021; McWatt, 2021; Owolabi & Bekele, 2021; Saverino & Zarcone, 2021; Stunden et al, 2021; Tucker & Anderson, 2021; Chiuta et al, 2020; Iqbal et al, 2022; Nakai et al, 2022). Moreover, blended learning approaches included a “flipped” virtual classroom model that combined synchronous and asynchronous education to encourage students' active, self‐directed learning (McWatt, 2021; Yoo et al, 2021; Harmon et al, 2021; Iqbal et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alongside the use of multimodal physical tools (e.g., anatomy models, 3D‐printed models, and cadavers), digital resources were utilized to improve the accessibility of online learning. These digital resources included software, massive open online courses or MOOCs, anatomical images, digital histology slides, YouTube and other online videos, virtual and augmented reality simulations, digitized live‐streamed cadaveric dissections, virtual laboratory workspaces, virtual worksheets, and mobile applications (Srinivasan, 2020; Bernigau et al, 2021; Böckers et al, 2021; Chan et al, 2021; Griepp et al, 2021; Harmon et al, 2021; John et al, 2021; McWatt, 2021; Owolabi & Bekele, 2021; Saverino & Zarcone, 2021; Stunden et al, 2021; Tucker & Anderson, 2021; Chiuta et al, 2020; Iqbal et al, 2022; Nakai et al, 2022). Moreover, blended learning approaches included a “flipped” virtual classroom model that combined synchronous and asynchronous education to encourage students' active, self‐directed learning (McWatt, 2021; Yoo et al, 2021; Harmon et al, 2021; Iqbal et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note : Numbers in superscripts represent the cited resources: 1 Alsharif et al (2020); 2 Cuschieri and Calleja Agius (2020); 3 Evans et al (2020); 4 Franchi (2020); 5 Longhurst et al (2020); 6 Pacheco et al (2020); 7 Pather et al (2020); 8 Srinivasan (2020); 9 Albalushi et al (2021); 10 Banovac et al (2021); 11 Baptiste (2021); 12 Bernigau et al (2021); 13 Border et al (2021); 14 Böckers et al (2021); 15 Chan et al (2021); 16 Cheng et al (2021); 17 Choudhary (2021); 18 Cortese and Frascio (2021); 19 Chytas et al (2021); 20 De Carvalho Filho et al (2021); 21 Dulohery et al (2021); 22 Evans and Pawlina (2021); 23 Flynn et al (2021); 24 Griepp et al (2021); 25 Harrell et al (2021); 26 Harmon et al (2021); 27 Iqbal et al (2022); 28 Iwanaga et al (2021); 29 Iwanaga et al (2021); 30 John et al (2021); 31 Kurtulmus‐Yilmaz and Önöral (2022); 32 Mahdy and Sayed (2021); 33 McWatt (2021); 34 Naidoo et al (2021); 35 Natsis et al (2021); 36 Ortadeveci et al (2021); 37 Owolabi and Bekele (2021); 38 Patra et al (2021); 39 Patra et al (2021); 40 Sadeesh et al (2021); 41 Saini et al (2021); 42 Saverino and Zarcone (2021); 43 Şenol et al (2021); 44 Singal et al (2021); 45 Sotgiu et al (2021); 46 Srivastava et al (2021); 47 Stunden et al (2021); 48 Tg Muda et al (2021); 49 Thom et al (2021); 50 Totlis et al (2021); 51 Tucker and Anderson (2021); 52 Vidya et al (2021); 53 Yan et al (2021); 54 Yoo et al (…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the context of medical education, future research should investigate challenges in improving e-learning infrastructure [ 36 ] and possibilities for continuous self-assessments or virtual reality-based e-assessment applications [ 9 , 37 ], ideally through cooperation between interdisciplinary academic teams and students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many medical universities have reduced the acceptance of bodies during outbreaks because the donor might have been infected with COVID-19, and it was not feasible to test the cadavers [ 1 , 2 ]. To avoid the risk of infection between students and teachers, most lectures and classes have been delivered online [ 19 , 20 ]. Therefore, high-quality anatomical models are necessary for remote teaching [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%