Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop at the 15th Conference Of the European Chapter of the Association for Co 2017
DOI: 10.18653/v1/e17-4003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replication issues in syntax-based aspect extraction for opinion mining

Abstract: Reproducing experiments is an important instrument to validate previous work and build upon existing approaches. It has been tackled numerous times in different areas of science. In this paper, we introduce an empirical replicability study of three well-known algorithms for syntactic centric aspect-based opinion mining. We show that reproducing results continues to be a difficult endeavor, mainly due to the lack of details regarding preprocessing and parameter setting, as well as due to the absence of availabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A trained classifier for the target domain, clustering was utilized as it reduced the gap between domain-specific words of various domains. Marrese-Taylor et al [8] introduced a replicability issues in syntactic centric aspect-based opinion mining. It focused syntactic techniques, which tend to demonstrate a lower level of transparency due to the increasing level of model complexity and the lack of code accessibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trained classifier for the target domain, clustering was utilized as it reduced the gap between domain-specific words of various domains. Marrese-Taylor et al [8] introduced a replicability issues in syntactic centric aspect-based opinion mining. It focused syntactic techniques, which tend to demonstrate a lower level of transparency due to the increasing level of model complexity and the lack of code accessibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%