2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Replication protein A 32 interacts through a similar binding interface with TIPIN, XPA, and UNG2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GST-pull-down assays confirmed the previously reported interaction between the Tim-Tipin complex and RPA (Supplementary Figure S1E) (3,14,37). The Tim-Tipin-RPA mixture showed a homogenic complex formation by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Figure 1A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GST-pull-down assays confirmed the previously reported interaction between the Tim-Tipin complex and RPA (Supplementary Figure S1E) (3,14,37). The Tim-Tipin-RPA mixture showed a homogenic complex formation by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Figure 1A).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In turn, RPA provides a binding platform for additional factors during DNA repair (35,36). These include Tim-Tipin (3,37), and the DNA repair factors XPA (xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A protein) (38), UNG2 (uracyl DNA glycosylase-2) (39) and RAD52 (40), which are reported to bind to the WH domain of the RPA32 subunit. Tim-Tipin cooperate with RPA to assure the structural integrity of the replication fork, however, the nature of this interaction is elusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NMR titration results agree well with observations from structural comparison. In another previous NMR-based study of Tipin peptide binding to RPA32C, chemical shift perturbations for those residues located in the a1/ a2 loop have also been observed, but the data interpretation and the built structural model are not accurate [21].…”
Section: Molecular Basis Of Smarcal1 Peptide Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…UNG2 is a base excision repair enzyme that participates in the cellular mechanisms for the specific removal of uracil residues from DNA resulting from misincorporation of dUTPs during replication or cytosine deamination (42). Therefore, the role of UNG2 in DNA repair at the replication fork during chromosomal replication is well established, since UNG2 contains determinants required for interactions with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and the 32-kDa subunit (RPA2) of replication protein A (RPA) (1,14,19,28,30). In addition, UNG2 plays a specific role in somatic hypermutations and class-switch recombination (CSR) at the immunoglobulin locus of B lymphocytes (42).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%