1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1975.tb03998.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply from Parsons et al

Abstract: We agree with much that Malin has stated in this paper (J. Microsc. 103,79, 1975).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…• and featuring the beam response pattern characteristic of PAPER dipole elements (Parsons et al 2008;Pober et al 2012). The PAPER beam response pattern is illustrated in the leftmost panel of Figure 7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• and featuring the beam response pattern characteristic of PAPER dipole elements (Parsons et al 2008;Pober et al 2012). The PAPER beam response pattern is illustrated in the leftmost panel of Figure 7.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the lack of an optical afterglow and analysis of the BAT spectrum suggested that the source might lie at high redshifts (Markwardt et al 2008;Xiao & Schaefer 2011), but constraints on the X-ray spectrum precluded a high redshift fit to the data (Parsons et al 2008). Association with the known, bright optical source would suggest a lower redshift for the burst, but it was not clear whether this was the host galaxy or a star in chance alignment.…”
Section: Initial Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final enhanced XRT position, with uncertainty 1. ′′ 5, was 06h 48m 58.03s +50 44 07.7 (J2000), coincident with the optical source (Parsons et al 2008). The Galactic longitude and latitude (l =165.369, b =20.301) correspond to a sight-line with moderate dust extinction (AV =0.25) from our own galaxy (Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011).…”
Section: Initial Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a significant improvement in the number of correct scores for BMI (step 1) (58% vs 83 % p = 0.00 (two tailed paired t-test) and weight loss (step 2) (52 % vs 84 % p = 0.00 (two tailed paired t-test), with a 61 % increase in correct total 'MUST' score (p = 0.00, two tailed paired t-test). Malnutrition prevalence increased from 26 % to 36 % (14% medium risk, 22 % high risk); dietetic referrals did not increase during this time (7% vs 5 %).Malnutrition prevalence in West Sussex care homes is similar to that seen locally and nationally (2,4) . Inaccurate calculation of 'MUST' underestimated the prevalence of malnutrition similar to that seen when a non-validated tool is used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Malnutrition prevalence in West Sussex care homes is similar to that seen locally and nationally (2,4) . Inaccurate calculation of 'MUST' underestimated the prevalence of malnutrition similar to that seen when a non-validated tool is used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%