2015
DOI: 10.1002/uog.14756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply: New ultrasound technologies to classify deep pelvic endometriosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been demonstrated in multiple reports. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Given a report suggesting the inaccuracy of this imaging modality, 13 the pathologic verification represented in these studies of sonographic identification of DIE, can be considered as contrasting evidence. A comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of DIE states that ultrasound is superior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been demonstrated in multiple reports. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Given a report suggesting the inaccuracy of this imaging modality, 13 the pathologic verification represented in these studies of sonographic identification of DIE, can be considered as contrasting evidence. A comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of DIE states that ultrasound is superior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%