2019
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1909628116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to Auerbach et al.: How our Opinion piece invites collaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The publication of this opinion caused intensive debates within the international citizen science community on whether or not citizen science needs a definition at a general level and if the Austrian criteria are exclusionary and narrow or enable different forms of citizen science to be included. On a more specific level, this debate showcased how different conceptions and interpretations of citizen science can lead to serious misunderstandings, but also to new insights and positive reactions (Auerbach et al 2019;Heigl et al 2019b).…”
Section: Different Interpretations Of Citizen Science In Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The publication of this opinion caused intensive debates within the international citizen science community on whether or not citizen science needs a definition at a general level and if the Austrian criteria are exclusionary and narrow or enable different forms of citizen science to be included. On a more specific level, this debate showcased how different conceptions and interpretations of citizen science can lead to serious misunderstandings, but also to new insights and positive reactions (Auerbach et al 2019;Heigl et al 2019b).…”
Section: Different Interpretations Of Citizen Science In Europementioning
confidence: 99%